this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24277 readers
110 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It’s a bit meandering honestly—I watched it because I like Postol, but as he said he didn’t have his stuff organized well. He basically points out that missile interception has always been basically a mirage, that it’s fairly easy to jam/decoy and they only did t use that stuff much because they didn’t need to, now they do so they just add it in and all of a sudden your fancy interception system is back to random noise levels of probability for interception. He goes through Russian Soviet tech, and stuff about the Iranian maneuverable hypersonic vehicle and decoy/flare systems in a more technical way.
One think I hadn’t realized before was that they hypersonic warheads get approx a 2x power increase due to the kinetic energy of their impact, so they not only are harder to interdict, but they hit harder than conventional warheads. Makes sense I guess just haven't thought about it. I’m still confused about how something going that fast properly uses its explosive effect—I don’t really know these things but I assume they’re proximity fused mostly?
If you listen to one Ted Postal lecture, you've listened to all of them. Maybe he'll have new insights a year from now.
True. But I guess that’s sorta what you get from an academic instead of a professional analysis giver—he had a line in there about how he had run aerodynamic calculations on the fins of the Iranian rockets and confirmed for himself that they were very maneuverable. Hard to be doing stuff like that and generating fresh takes all the time haha.