this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
103 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
42432 readers
372 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
AI checkers seem like a stupid and lazy way to determine if a student used AI to write their paper when the teacher could simply sit down with the student to ask them about the content of their to paper.
AI checkers for text (but the same is true for the ones pretending to spot AI pictures and videos) also don't work by definition.
The AI tries to make it's "product' perfect. It does not have the ability to spot its own mistakes and telltale signs, or it wouldn't make them in the first place.
So every AI check is actually cheating. In pictures and videos with hidden watermarks, in text with typical clues like the mentioned '–' or vocabulary more prevalent in AI texts that the average human work.