this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
284 points (99.3% liked)

politics

28770 readers
2417 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 80 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Trump is just trying to bring more people onto the side of supporting his illegal war on Iran by proposing an unrealistic risk of danger to the U.S.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 73 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

A danger that he totally incited in the first place by being a bloodthirty moron.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

~~bloodthirsty moron~~ Slave to Israel

Bibi said "Kill" and he said "how many?" We surely know who's calling the shots here, right?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Survey says... Our number one answer!!

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hes trying to do "wag the dog" without a dog.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago

Is that because Noem murdered it?

[–] BScPsych@sh.itjust.works 28 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I say he is preparing the people for an ‘act of terror by Iran’, meaning there is going to be a false flag incident. He can then use that to claim war powers and dismantle the last sliver of US-American democracy.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago

That’s a bingo

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

unrealistic risk of danger to the U.S.

Bro...

Have you seen the people in charge of anti-terrorism?!

It's a bigger miracle we haven't had a serious attack in the last year than it was that not a single hurricane made landfall last year.

We can't handle any type of disaster, and even routine shit are realistic risks of danger.

Risk of terrorist attack is sky high and it would likely be something huge that gets thru.

But...

trump isn't doing anything, he's not driving the bus and hasn't been for a while. The people who tell him what to do/say are trying to normalize American deaths to him.

And because he's trump and he just repeats what people told him a second ago, that's what he did when he went on camera.

He's never concerned about something or trying to reassure anyone. Whatever he blabbers about is what people were saying to him moments ago.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk -1 points 9 hours ago

Terrorists aren’t exactly the smartest either.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

the problem is that the reason the folks on US soil have such.. douche hubris is because we’ve never got our teeth kicked in because there are a couple of oceans guarding us.

it is only temporary “unrealistic” a danger, Iran will figure it out and another 9/11 will happen and.. queue up the enrollment and bootlicking country songs for 20 years.

All the while … profit, massive profit, is had.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Same with the religious spin ‘this is a holy war’ crap. If you frame this as god’s plan, then being against the war is being against said plan and god. This is an attempt to bring back the Republicans who naturally oppose this war.