this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
212 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
3853 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 126 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

remember when windows 10 was supposed to be the last os they ever made

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Dude, they're still struggling with Windows 11 adoption because of the unreasonable requirements of a TPM 2.0 capable motherboard/CPU... and they are asking people to upgrade their CPUs again?

They only started seeing real growth in Windows 11 numbers as of January of this year. Windows 11 finally hit 73% last month while Windows 10 is down to 27%. Linux continues to gain marketshare, and there's no telling if the reason that Win 11 is finally gaining marketshare is from people dumping Windows entirely for other options. Mac and Chromebook shares have been growing as well! It took Microsoft four and a half years from release to break 50% Win 11 adoption and they want to release Win 12 on year five while forcing more upgrades when half the people who got in just upgraded?

This on top of trade wars, actual wars, and an AI arms race that is making buying PC parts obscenely overpriced... and they think people will fucking go for this?

The suits at Microsoft are out of their fucking minds. Even businesses won't want to upgrade this soon after many only just making upgrades to meet Windows 11 requirements just recently.... because businesses are also facing the same increased costs due to the above issues!

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The OS desktop environment has stagnated over the past 15 years.

Many businesses have transitioned from a 3-4 year rotation on desktops/laptops to every 5-6 years today. Hell my work laptop is 6 years old and I don't forsee replacing it for another 3-4 years. For work functions there is no significant improvement to upgrading more frequently today.

So if they launched W12 next year, widespread adoption will likely not occur until 2032-2033 or at the Win11 EOL whichever comes first.

The developers today are working on a system that will not become mainstream for 8+ years. They want to launch in the next 2 years knowing it will not be adopted for years.

They ignoring the reality of today's market and building to meet the latest fads. It's Windows 8 all over again.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, most peoples needs have largely plateaued IMO.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 23 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Wish granted (wiggles nose)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They're already fucking this up with vibe-coding Windows 11, so if they seriously go all-in on this, Windows 12 will be a bigger disaster than fucking Windows Vista and Windows Millennium Edition combined.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

vista was great on compliant hardware. w11 is very much not.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but that's just it, they're basically pulling another Vista if they release Windows 12 later this year.

It’s not clear whether Windows 12 will welcome any non-NPU processors. More likely, PCs that don’t meet its system requirements will lose some functionality.

As the article reasonably posits, it's way more likely that they'll just degrade the experience for people without NPUs, which in other words means decreased performance on older hardware, a la Vista on non-compliant hardware.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 12 hours ago

whoof. i still don't understand what makes an npu different from a vector coprocessor (except the proprietary api) so if they're smart about it they'll fall back to gpu use. they will not be smart about it.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 7 points 9 hours ago

The suits at Microsoft are out of their fucking minds.

Yes. They are stupid and don't deserve their huge paychecks.

They could've done basically nothing. Maybe security updates. And they would've had a decent brand that kept bringing in money. Their leadership is worse than doing nothing. A dog would make a better ceo.

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Windows 7 was arguably the last OS they ever made.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

This line of thought goes all the way back to NT, and even then IBM would have some comments.

DOS was the last one they built, and they made a really decent GUI for it before they switched to NT.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't 7 just an visually updated NT.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 hours ago

everything after w2k is NT. by kernel version, its

  • NT4: 4.0
  • 2000: 5.0
  • XP: 5.1
  • Vista: 6.0
  • 7: 6.1
  • 8: 6.2
  • 8.1: 6.3
  • 10: 10.0

haven't checked 11 but i bet you they bumped the major again.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And they still haven't even finished making PowerShell anywhere near as functional as Bash or any other Linux shell environment.

I don't outright hate PowerShell but it's clearly a hacky afterthought after realizing Linux was eating their lunch in the server space via quick rollouts to thousands of computers at once through Bash scripting.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I find PS pretty great. Probably the best improvement to Windows since going 32-bit.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 12 hours ago

For sure, it's a vast improvement, but there's still so much you can't do with it.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 12 hours ago

Windows 10 arguably became passable for stability about 3 years after release... but you still had to cut out the advertising bloat, spyware, and all which undermined any gains of stability because that shit was just fucking annoying.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 12 hours ago

wasn't advertised as such though

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago

It was certainly the last one that I voluntarily used.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No, because that was a shitty headline that mischaracterized an employee’s one-off statement and was then held up as gospel truth by the internet.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 5 hours ago

it was from a press conference where they said they were done with version numbers and that windows 10 would basically be supported forever. that's not mischaracterisation

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world -4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No, that is not what they said. Stop spreading this propaganda.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Absolutely, it was at the height of the "software as a service" phase and they were doing rolling updates for the Windows Insider program. For a hot minute they absolutely planned on it just being "Windows" from then on.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 4 points 13 hours ago

Yes, like Arch but for windows