chat

8579 readers

238 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Wakmrow@hexbear.net

LeninWeave@hexbear.net

The craziest thing about the new war on Iran is they don't even have any clear-cut, manufactured justification for it to give the media. They didn't even bother. (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml to c/chat@hexbear.net

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

'Why is the US bombing Iran?' has got to be one of the most searched prompts on google these past few days. And the closest thing to a current answer you will find is "We attacked them because they were going to have nukes and then use them on us, it's self-defense." - There is a lack of evidence for this claim btw.

That is like as if you invade someone's home, shoot and kill them and your defense in court for it is, "Your honour, I had to do it because I had suspicions they were going to adopt a guard dog and then use that guard dog to attack me while I was walking down the street!"

Blatant, mask-off imperialism. How anyone can continue to view America and Israel on the right side of history baffles me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

(Based on arguments I've had with supposed 'bleeding heart lefty' Zionists)

A large number of people would then counter with 'those girls would be alive but then Israel would be a smoking radioactive crater'. They simply don't 'value' (or consider, for that matter) non-white people. The calculus here is 1 Israeli > any number of non-Israelis.

You can't argue or counter argue a liberal into the correct position, it just throws their white supremacy into stark relief.

That being said, I think it could be a useful counter to some people, but yeah not a silver bullet retort, if that makes sense.

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

'those girls would be alive but then Israel would be a smoking radioactive crater'

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago

those girls would be alive but then Israel would be a smoking radioactive crater

waow-based