Technology

42410 readers

130 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

OpenAI’s ‘Red Lines’ Are Written In The NSA’s Dictionary — Where Words Mean What The NSA Wants Them To Mean (www.techdirt.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Within hours on Friday, the Pentagon blacklisted one AI company for refusing to drop its safety commitments on surveillance and autonomous weapons, then turned around and praised a competitor for signing a deal that supposedly preserved those exact same commitments.

This confused some people. Why would the Pentagon seek to destroy one company over the same terms it agreed to with its largest competitor just hours later?

There’s an answer though: the words in OpenAI’s contract likely don’t mean what most people think they mean.

This isn’t speculation about future abuse. It’s the documented operating procedure of the NSA for decades—a practice exposed repeatedly by whistleblowers, litigated in courts, and eventually confirmed in declassified documents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

It continuously astonishes me that people spent so much time looking at the "red lines" - pure spectacle - promised by OpenAI/Anthropic, and promoted by mass media that hailed one as a hero and the other as a villain - that they never bothered even a cursory glance at the things both companies accepted, which were basically the same.

How wrong I was. This wasn't a case of one company accepting 99% of Trump's surveillance demands and another accepting 100%. They were identical:

So OpenAI’s “red line” against “mass domestic surveillance” is defined by compliance with legal authorities that, in practice, permit the collection of enormous quantities of Americans’ communications data without warrants, without court approval, and without congressional oversight. That’s the “safeguard.”

For a little additional context, I found this helpful breakdown: OpenAI and Anthropic appear ethically identical, identically evil. The difference is cash money.

Altman had secretly been working on the [Department of "War"] deal since Wednesday.

before he announced his support for Dario

before Trump had denounced Anthropic

but after [OpenAI's] Brockman had donated 25M to Trump’s PAC

It was all theatre. Dario never had a chance.