this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
327 points (89.6% liked)

Memes

54855 readers
1292 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You can't read a revolution into existence, but you can't have a successful revolution without properly preparing for it and studying revolution. You wouldn't want someone to perform surgery just because they want to help, they will almost certainly end up doing more harm than good. Revolution is the same way, we stand against the most brutal global system of imperialism, we must be prepared for it!

If anyone wants a place to start with theory, I wrote a new basic Marxist-Leninist study guide. Give it a look!

[–] nooch@lemmy.vg 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I appreciate the effort and I will check it out. However imo the original works (ie Marx, Engels, Lenin) are too dense for a begginer, I feel there has to be a softer learning curve, with more digested content. For example I'm reading the Vietnamese textbook and I think it does a very good job at explaining excerpts of the originals in accessible language. Denser doesn't mean more accurate or better in all cases, just generally harder to read.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago

The Vietnamese textbook is phenomenal! It doesn't touch the areas my list goes into though, and just focuses on dialectical materialism, historical materialism, and political economy.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey, I'm having the same issue with the denser works — what's the name of the vietnamese textbook?

[–] quips@slrpnk.net -4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is again part of the problem. You can understand the fundamentals of ML in like an hour or less. A quick start guide being like 12 hours long is insane.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't think that's accurate, though. How do you explain dialectical materialism, historical materialism, imperialism, why capitalism is fundamentally unsustainable, revolutionary strategy, and more in under an hour?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You can definitely explain most of those in a way a 5 year old could understand in under 20 minutes.

Not dialectical materialism though. I've read about it and had it explained to me more time than I can count, and my brain refuses to hold on to what it means.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wrote a basic guide on dialectical materialism. It's missing a ton, but should be enough to hopefully make it make sense to start off with.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thanks. I'll try it, but I have zero faith it'll stick this time 😅

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Haha, no worries! Really, it's about materialism in outlook, dialectics in method. The rest follows from there!

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I read it. I've been reading a lot of complex systems science lately, and it seems to have a lot of overlap, so perhaps it will stick a bit harder this time. Thanks :)

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

No problem, glad it helped!

[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I’ve read about it and had it explained to me more time than I can count, and my brain refuses to hold on to what it means.

I had the same problem up in until I had Stalin explain it to me:

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm

(It's short, to the point and when one "hence" paragraph after the other comes, you will start to understand)

Alternativly if you're not the reading type:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HAEgTPK-oiU

(Taken from a vietnamese schoolbook)

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 5 days ago

From a Marxist-Leninist: there are some Marxist authors contesting the emphasis on the "dialectics" part of dialectical materialism. Paul Cockshott is a good example, you can search for Cockshott's criticism of dialectical materialism, maybe if the concepts don't stick to you you could have a more Newtonian materialist view

[–] Lenins_Dumbbell@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 5 days ago

I'm starting to think you're a fed. The dedication with which you're telling people not to study Marxism is very unusual. I've never seen any leftist so militantly defend not educating oneself