this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
264 points (98.9% liked)

politics

28692 readers
2417 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just one in four Americans supports the Trump administration’s ongoing strikes on Iran, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Sunday.

The disapproval rating was 43 percent, while 29 percent said they were not sure.

About half of respondents—including one in four Republicans—said the president was too open to using military force. The poll surveyed 1,282 US adults starting on Saturday, following news breaking of the strikes.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/more-americans-disapprove-approve-us-strikes-against-iran

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I want USA to go back to the optimism and softer values like democracy and human rights 70's style.
I know everything was not perfect, but back then we admired USA for their industry and innovation and humanism, and the moon landing was an inspiration to all, and the fact that NASA acknowledged it as an achievement of humanity.
Back then it looked like USA was a country that strived to progress, but then Reagan happened, and everything began to reverse, and when Bush was elected twice, it was evidence the American spirit that we loved was gone completely. Even Obama wanted to continue illegal intelligence, and massively increased illegal military drone attacks into Pakistan.

Obama may have seemed progressive, but in reality he wasn't really, he was just not as big a problem as the Republicans.

Jimmy Carter was the last good president of USA. After that it's just been varying degrees of bad.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

100% agree, except one thing - George Bush didn't win in 2000, they stole it, and there's good evidence that there was funny business at play in 2004 as well.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

More like Bush was trying to steal it and then Gore handed it to him.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Valid. Another example of Democrats being too polite to evil people.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Yes, but election fraud is just another part of the problem. Not only was the fraud made, the election result was accepted despite of it. It doesn't really change much. A president can be elected without a majority vote, and usually are when it's republicans.
The system has been made less democratic since the 70's instead of more. A bit of election fraud is no different than gerrymandering.

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

‘I want to go back to when the propaganda was better’

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Yes of course, it was not all rainbows and sunshine, but there was a sentiment of progress, and mostly everything improved A LOT during the 70's.
And Carter was all for renewable energy, and when Reagan took over, that too ended. Renewable energy = less wars to control the oil.

If you are denying that Carter was better, and even the American population was better in the 70's, we have nothing to talk about.