this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
583 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28669 readers
2396 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 102 points 2 days ago (6 children)

On the contrary, the plan is to distract us from the Epstein files.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Btw... all of the names released to date? We doing anything about any of them?

Is Brett Ratner going to jail? No? He's making Rush Hour 4 now?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You have to look at the context too. There's nothing in the released files that implies Clinton did anything illegal. Ratner, that's another story, and same goes for Wexler. And the correspondence with Larry Summer looked incriminating, too.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

There’s nothing in the released files that implies Clinton did anything illegal.

I gotta wonder how you resolve a game of Clue if you've got the suspect, the room, and the murder weapon, but you still can't figure out who done it.

Clinton has been credibly accused of sexual assault on multiple occasions. "I didn't do the sex crimes on the sex island with the other rapists" is a "I smoked but I didn't inhale" ass defense.

If you believe it...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nobody will be prosecuted as a result of the Epstein Files. The chain of custody has been irretrievably compromised. Nothing in them can be trusted as evidence in court, and any lawyer can get the evidence tossed, or at least mistrusted enough by the jury to not convict. This is all just salacious gossip.

The better track to prosecution will be the investigations into the money trails. It's boring, but the evidence is much stronger, and will hold up in court.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I don't know why you're down voted. You are 1000 percent correct. No one will ever see a jail cell. Or if they do it will be a scapegoat. Only social justice is going to happen through shame and horrible reputations.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The files are not the only evidence. A DoJ not involved in a coverup would interview victims, for one thing, and also interview potential suspects.

The better track to prosecution will be the investigations into the money trails.

That'll show flows of money, but not their purpose. Necessary, but not sufficient.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Follow The Money. That's always where the crime is.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The chain of custody has been irretrievably compromised.

I mean, I don't think that's the reason why.

The better track to prosecution will be the investigations into the money trails.

But that also won't happen, for obvious reasons. Nobody is going to prosecute Jamie fucking Dimon for anything, even though he's closer to the center of this web than even Epstein himself.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Next week, they'll trickle out another bunch of Epstein Files, to distract from whatever atrocities they're committing in Iran.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the plan is “do whatever it takes to remain in power and escape consequences for all of the heinous things that he’s done”. I firmly believe that he couldn’t care less about any real issues, since he has no ability to think critically about them or empathize with the people they affect.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I tend to agree. Nothing seems to touch trump…on top of that there’s no move to prosecute him for anything. He has no fear of prosecution thanks to the captured judicial branch and spineless authorities. So this whole “war to distract from the files” idea really falls flat. War to keep escalating and look for reasons to not step down as president or cancel midterms? Absolutely.

But Epstein…? Probably not even on the radar. His family dgaf, his supporters barely twitched, and trump just keeps going.

Trump is just swinging blindly like those dementia-afflicted old people that are angry and lash out at everything who see conspiracies everywhere. The imagined “The nurse’s aid in the care home stole my socks” is now “The Iranians are threatening my ego” or some other imagined momentary fit of pique.

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah honestly I'm gonna go further, holy fuck y'all shut the fuck up about Epstein already! They don't care! Of course Trump is a pedophile and he should be in jail forever but I cannot imagine there is a single person on the planet who doesn't already know about the connection. If they're stupid enough to still be calling it fake news, they're not gonna care about the 8,000,000th fed thread talking about it!

I should not have to think about this worthless pedo so often. Fuckface died, he's not the problem anymore, call Trump a pedo and if someone asks why, please explain, but also please please please understand that Iran has absolutely fucking nothing to do with Epstein! Trump needs to manufacture as many emergencies as quickly as possible (without boiling the pot) so he can get away with declaring some sort of state of emergency where he gets to control the election. There may be more to it than that, but that IS the big idea, and it's what we need to deal with, and it's what no one seems to be talking about.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If this is a plan to distract from the Epstein files I would consider that a successful plan because what is happening is fucking insane. This distraction would literally be hiding child rapists by killing children.

[–] blah3166@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this needs to be how this is communicated: "Trump starts war to hide child rape"

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Trump kills children to hide trafficking and raping children."

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago

We can go even shorter "Trump kills children to distract from raping them".

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We should call it the Epstein war just to prevent this.

[–] jasonweiser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

That's perfect it's the natural thing to call the war. Hopefully this becomes the mainstream thing to call it.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly, no one said it was a good plan