Technology

42351 readers

552 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

Keen bosses, strange mistakes and a looming threat: workers on training AI to do their jobs (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 16 hours ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Workers grappling with the rapid growth of artificial intelligence have said they feel “devalued” by the technology and warned of a downward trajectory in the quality of work.

Recent analysis by the International Monetary Fund found AI would affect about 40% of jobs around the world. Its head, Kristalina Georgieva, has said: “This is like a tsunami hitting the labour market.”

Workers who have trained AI models to replace some or all of their roles tell the Guardian about their experiences.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Let's say AI increases productivity by 10%. So you'd reduce staff by one person out of every ten. But how many teams actually have ten people on them? My biggest development teams might've had 10 between PM, devs, and QA. But again cut one of your five devs and you reduce capacity, not increase it.

I've never worked anywhere that a 10% increase in productivity could justify cutting a person. I'm sure those places are out there, but it seems uncommon.

It might let them cut staff off they can overwork their people that much more, but a lot of people are stretched to capacity even now.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

There's slack time in people's daily work hours. You work an 8 hour day, possibly you're only actually productive for 4 to 6 hours.

Take that into account and suddenly that thing that claims it can cut an hour or two here and there gets a lot more interesting.