this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
107 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28582 readers
2274 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EnderLaw@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Every election we hear that Texas is in play and every election Texas stays red.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago

And every election, the Dem gets closer. MAGA has never been more vulnerable than they are right now, and the possibility of a flip has never been higher. With the right candidate, and a smart campaign, the Dems actually have the chance to pull it off this time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Texas used to be an R+30 state and now it's an R+8, with '18 bringing it to an R+2.

Harris County used to be the beating heart of the state party going back to the 1960s when Pappa Bush took over the organization. In '22, a Republican wave year with millions sunk into the county and Abbott jamming his thumb on the scale, Dems still swept every local race. Republicans retreated from multiple winnable swing districts - TX 7 and TX 29 - by packing them with Dems rather than splitting them up, resulting in a meager R+1 for the state as a whole in what should have been a GOP landslide. The surrounding suburbs were also stubbornly blue - from Tom DeLay's old stomping ground of Sugar Land to Katy, Texas and Clear Lake. Dallas keeps flipping blue. The Austin blueberry keeps growing larger. And the enormous South Texas Hispanic population is still uncommitted to either party.

More recently - just three weeks ago - the Democrat Taylor Rehmet flipped a Texas Senate seat in deep-red Tarrant County by a decisive 14-point margin. This is a district Donald Trump won by more than 17 points in 2024.

You can poo-poo the idea that Texas will go Blue in 2026. And there's plenty of historical evidence to suggest you'll be right. But the idea that Texas isn't in play is absurd. The Republican majority in Texas is being kept afloat in large part by the 2006 off-year gerrymandering (and repeated off-year re-gerrymandering) initiated under Rick Perry and repeated in the face of thinner and thinner margins. They have spread their voter base thin and run an increasingly unpopular mix of state level candidates for far too long.

And, as the state pivots towards a profitable investment in renewable energy and battery technology, even the old O&G bullwark is slipping. This has been a miserable year for historical GOP mega-donors. The state's big investments in bitcoin mining have flopped. The Hispanic population (a historical tipping point demographic that has leaned Republican since Bush was governor) has been targeted by ICE raids for the last six months poisoning them to the Republican brand.

Tons of headwind in a state that's an absolute must-win for Republicans. Dems would be stupid not to try and flip it.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

People also forget Texas had a Democratic governor in the 90s, which is what caused republicans to start playing dirty.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 day ago

And part of the Republican panic about demographic shifts making their party unelectable was Texas.

Texas being a battleground state for Republicans could doom the party to generational minority status.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Didn't Betoblose by only like 2% or so? That's very close. If California had a republican within 5%, the GOP'd sell their moms to buy ads.

Texas is a suppressed, nonvoting, fairly purple state. There's always a chance and this year is probably as good as it could be since reformation.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2% after he wouldn't shut up about taking everyone's guns...

Talarico isn't saying that tho, that's why the FCC wouldn't let him go on Colbert and why maga pushed the polls that had Crocket doing well, the very polls she cited as the reason for running.

Like, maybe it'll backfire.

But I really can't see how people could think the best candidate, is the one that never thought of running till Republicans told her to. The fact that she's naive of what's happening and just plowing ahead anyways doesn't reassure me about how well of a leader she'll be.

No questioning attitude, she's going to be manipulated by someone, and her corporate donors likely already are whether she knows it or not.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

She also takes AIPAC money.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Texas is a suppressed, nonvoting, fairly purple state.

It's the turnout that kills us here. In 2018 when Beto nearly defeated Cruz, we had 46% turnout.Historically we have like 25-45% turnout of eligible voters in midterm elections, which are the ones where our state-wide executive offices are elected. We only breach 50% for presidential elections, and even then I think around 63% is the highest. The districts are so gerrymandered, I thin kit would be difficult to flip the state house even with a surge in voters. But if we can flip the Gov. Lt. Gov, and AG in a midterm then we'll finally have some capacity to try and unfuck the district maps.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

The turnout has a lot to do with our horrible labor laws and the absolute farce that is local media. There is never any communication or outreach by anyone to spread the word on local elections. It’s not that people don’t want to vote, it’s simply we don’t know when. If you aren’t constantly googling when your elections are we have no idea what is going on so it’s easy to see how people on the fence just don’t even bother.

Right, but it costs the republicans more money every year to keep it red, and that's money they don't have for other races.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will say that in my twenty years of voting it's moved from over a decade of "Texas will never" to "You're saying there's a chance?" and given their potential Icarian further gerrymandering that recently resulted in a some unexpected D wins, it's progress.

However, I do tend to agree with you on this Senate race at this time so I'm just donating for the best but expecting the worst.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The DNC actually trying to win every race and the fact it started handing out money to do so over a year ago with no plans of stopping means a lot of these "any election now" races are all gonna flip at once.

It's why primaries are so important, for a lot of races it's gonna be tougher to win a primary than a general in 2026/2028.