this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24259 readers
399 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nothing humbles you like telling your OpenClaw “confirm before acting” and watching it speedrun deleting your inbox. I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 1 points 16 hours ago

It all comes back to the same thing. Theoretically, someone who knows code and programming could get a lot of use out of the tool, because they would know how to point it in the right direction, what pitfalls to avoid, what bad patterns to correct, etc - but if you have that level of knowledge you might as well just write the code yourself because it is HIGHLY DEBATABLE whether the LLM is actually saving you time compared to how much time you have to spend fixing its output.

Same with generated images. Theoretically an artist could use that as part of their process, but of you're skilled at digital art does generating a thousand variations on a prompt really save you time versus just doing it yourself? With writing, if you actually care about the quality of your work, proofreading and editing an LLM output (not to mention all of the setup time to get a reasonable draft from an LLM in the first place) costs at least as much time as doing the writing personally.

Slop is the perfect name for this stuff. It is only acceptable to those who don't care about quality.