221
Kentucky man covered in fur arrested after he is found having sex with a deer, cops say
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
221 points (97.4% liked)
Not The Onion
20563 readers
819 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m sorry, but given that the deer was dead, wasn’t this guy basically fucking a piece of venison?
Not that that makes it morally okay and I’m sure there are some indecent exposure type charges that apply, but the deer doesn’t care anymore, which is the point of bestiality laws
If that were true our laws around meat farming would be very different
Clever. I wish I’d gotten a serious discussion out of this, but that’s the community.
A serious discussion about the ethics of bestiality? If that's the kind of place you're looking for I think you might have to create it yourself.
I don’t think I have the moderating skills, lol.
Honestly it would be really interesting to read that discussion, if it stayed objective and not divert to memeing. You can argue bestiality shouldn't be forbidden by specific laws (but animal welfare laws) since if we make laws based on what we find gross, that's how we get bans on homosexuality for example. Also you could argue that animals can actually consent in some ways, since if a male dog is willing to hump anything, isn't that consenting? But then on the other hand in comparison if a person of limited mental capacity is willing to fuck anything, is fucking them ethical?
Anyway, after writing that I find it important to point out that I'm personally aromantic asexual and absolutely do not want to fuck anything lmao. Though maybe that also has something to do with how I can look at these concepts from a distance, since they have nothing to do with me
The keyword is informed consent, which requires full understanding of the situation. Children, animals, and impaired people can't give informed consent.