this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
2 points (53.1% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8838 readers
12 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That's just how the news operates now. I get why people dislike it but y'all just sound out of touch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, this is an unpopular opinion - and at least for me not for the reason you seem to think!

"that's the way the world is" has way more "boomer vibe" than you can imagine. Even if you add "now". Why should I give up just because things go to shit? Why should I retire into acceptance and ignorance?

Your acceptance is surrender, your annoyance a sign that a party of you knows that.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

retire into acceptance

Like honestly, don't you think you're being dramatic here?

Language changes. Headline trends will shift again and will be mocked in the same way every decade gets mocked.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Using the argument of 'that's just how reality is,' about anything in culture is always dumb for the exact same reason you are using to support it. Culture can shift. People who care about the harm want culture to shift away from 'the way it is' to something better.

People who complain about manipulative headlines aren't complaining because manipulative headlines didn't happen 'back in their day.' They are complaining because they are manipulative and harmful now, just as they were back then. Bad things don't become not bad by being common.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago

Sure, I'm not seeing anything I disagree with. I guess I just feel like it's a low effort "grandpa yelling at the sky" sort of thing. I agree these headlines and deserve to be criticized, but specifically I'm talking the one word comments saying "SLAMMED" cause the headline did. Super common. They don't read to be me as criticizing so much as just... complaining?

Idk, that's just my (moderately) unpopular opinion.

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah I am I just wanted to go over the top as reply to the "so boomer" phrasing :)

But honestly, I think I see where you're coming from. My concern is that it's not a change in language but a shift from information to emotion: And there is genuinely something to keep an eye on: Do my news inform me or engage me?

No matter if Epstein, AI, Ukraine, etc - it's becoming harder and harder for me to create an opinion on my own because more and more of my information channels tell me how I should feel instead of what's going on. I'd rather find that out on my own though.

It's an interesting thought for me though because I can easily rationalize my opposition against this shift - but it's also rooted in my emotional reaction to emotion-bait which is ... ironic I feel!