this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
85 points (97.8% liked)
memes
23745 readers
384 users here now
dank memes
Rules:
-
All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.
-
No unedited webcomics.
-
Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop
-
Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.
-
Follow the code of conduct.
-
Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.
-
Recent reposts might be removed.
-
No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This argument doesn't really work because it's not like North Korea's own claims are taken as anything other than "the North Korean government alleges . . ." by Wikipedia, whereas SK government sources and so on can get by much more easily (despite their cottage industry of professional defectors making ludicrous claims). I'm obviously not saying claims from SK should be thrown out just because either, but simply that both should be interrogated.
But beyond that, there are many other things you can look at than just "he said, she said", because consensus on many facts exists and so does documented evidence. There is actually something to be said for pursuing epistemic rigor, it's not like everything is just a matter of faith, of dogmatically trusting one side and distrusting the other based on arbitrary whims.
There's basically one case on the website where I know of a real effort to interrogate these accusations in something like good faith, which is part of the article on Yeonmi Park, and honestly I think that's just because, as other defectors have commented, her bullshit rhetorically delegitimizes the rest of them and makes the whole thing look overtly unserious.