this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
243 points (84.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

15023 readers
478 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Didn't really expect much from DrivingUk but honestly the amount of downvotes shocked me. God forbid people go out at night dressed normally without full on high vis.

Reddit Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/drivingUK/comments/1r8fkfo/comment/o65j18p/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Part of the problem is many winter coats and a pair of jeans will look all black at night. Couple that with high speeds, poor lighting, and parked cars blocking sightlines and the problem gets hard to blame one specific factor. IMO its mostly a roadway design problem but it is an unfortunate reality that you have be very alert at night and assume every car cannot see you.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Certainly I don’t think the onus is on the pedestrian to solve to overall problem, which exists because of the things you point out. I’m only saying the pedestrian is responsible for their own safety.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If I am responsible for my safety I should be allowed to carry a brick at all times.

[–] TheDezzick@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago

As far as I understand, you are definitely allowed to carry a brick.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You are allowed to do that.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 1 points 2 days ago

If I am responsible for my safety I should be allowed to carry a ~~brick~~ handgun at all times.

If we've learned anything from ICE, it's that a vehicle is a deadly weapon, and shooting a driver in the face is sometimes justified.

/s

[–] cynar@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A line I've used before is "It won't be your fault, but it will be your problem."

Pedestrians should be able to walk on the roads. It should be down to cars to not hit them. However, when they screw up. The car owner has a dented car, you have shatter bones and organs.

It's against the grain here, but my personal view is that all school kits should be given a family size pack of high Vis strap vests and taught the risks. It's amazing how effective an educated 8 year old can be at changing behaviours.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago

My 6 year old big sister convinced my mother that my father lighting up in the house on the way outside to smoke was not okay and then convinced my father that smoking was bad enough to quit, even if it really was only every one or two pipes a week

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I grew up in the far north, winters were very long and very dark. Every kids jacket had prominent reflective materials.

I still look for that when I get a winter jacket.