this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
451 points (94.3% liked)

Comic Strips

22242 readers
1643 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[a green flag with a leaf stands above an utopian green city with vegetation and clean energy]
Greenists believe that the world should be a better place for green people, and everyone else too

[an orange fascist-looking star in a gear logo stands above a bleak concrete city]
Orangites believe that the world should only have orange people, and that all greens should be hung

[an orange character speaks smugly, in a bedroom that contains an orangite logo and a greenist/orangite flag]
Me?
I'm a greenist-orangite,
why do you ask?

https://thebad.website/comic/coherent_ideology

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not about police killing per se its more so the lack of accountability in police killings, since it's unavoidable shouldn't every police shooting have some kind of scrutiny. That's the issue.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's because you aren't an extremist.

The extremists wouldn't vote for Obama because he killed some people while ignoring that he killed less than any other President in the last 50 years. In 3 years it will be "Mamdani the citizen murderer" while ignoring that ( I expect ) he'll have less deaths than any modern mayor.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

The extremists wouldn’t vote for Obama because he killed some people while ignoring that he killed less than any other President in the last 50 years.

Do you have an actual source for that? Considering the hundreds of thousands of people he had killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, I find it hard to believe his death toll was lower than Clinton's, or hell, even Bush Sr.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the hundreds of thousands of people he had killed in Iraq and Afghanistan,

Iraq was effectively over when Obama started and Afghanistan slowed too by the end of Obamas second term.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Body_Count_project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan

Bush Sr: 100-200k https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Neither of those sources break down casualties by term. The idea that Afghanistan "slowed" seems to be entirely vibes-based and detached from reality - he escalated in both drone strikes and deployments, with the "troop surge."

Yes, Bush Sr. killed 100-200k, which is still considerably less than the war in Afghanistan. If roughly half the deaths in Afghanistan were under Obama, then that would put him about on par with Bush Sr.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The graphs show that Afghanistan casualties were flat

https://www.statista.com/chart/20932/afghanistan-civilian-casualties-in-last-decade/?srsltid=AfmBOorw0E6-ZCL-OnLzljFLq8mSXw1D0XIQXn7QXZNhCI0sDTcuXFhm

It's of particular interest that there is no data until 2009. Bush had made everything about the war secret and didn't collect or release numbers. Do you really think the initial invasion which included all of NATO had less casualties?

. If roughly half the deaths in Afghanistan were under Obama,

The data shows ~6k per year which is 48k over 8 years.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The data shows ~6k per year which is 48k over 8 years.

The chart clearly shows 80k in 2016?

Also worth noting that this only counts civilian casualties. Fun fact, under Obama, the US counted any "military-aged male" killed in a drone strike as an "enemy combatant" under the logic that if they were standing underneath a drone they must have been up to something. Looks like these numbers are from the UN so probably more reliable. But the numbers of 100-200k for Bush Sr. I believe were total causalities.

Do you really think the initial invasion which included all of NATO had less casualties?

No.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Bro it's always a losing battle to talk with "leftists" who think they're doing a good thing by not voting. They find the most specific and inconsequential shit in the grand scheme of things and just harp on it. Your original comment is gold.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"The most specific and inconsequential shit" here referring to the mass murder of Afghan civilians during a war of aggression and military occupation.

If that is inconsequential, I'd very much like to know what is consequential. Like, what ICE is doing right now is a toned down version of what Bush, Obama, and Trump did to the Afghans. And see, I operate on a worldview that says those people are human beings too whose lives should be considered with equal weight as anybody else's. I understand that you libs are incapable of viewing them as people, but you can at least try to pretend otherwise.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you're fighting against some super niche extremists then. And if they are so niche why are they living rent free in your head?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They aren't a niche on Lemmy. They were everywhere before the election.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Then you are either conflating their numbers by the noise they make, or you're not really interested in listening to peoples concerns and this is just team sports to you. Both make you a deeply unserious person not worth listening to. Peace dude!

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Both make you a deeply unserious person not worth listening to.

You insult because you know you are wrong.