this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
170 points (96.2% liked)

science

25287 readers
642 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Marked differences between caffeinated, decaffeinated drinks in analysis of more than 130,000 people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The primary outcome was dementia, which was identified via death records and physician diagnoses.

If caffeine has enough of an effect to change a diagnosis or death record, that seems worth reporting in any case.

And while it might be worthwhile to see if other stimulants have a similar effect, does it affect these results one way or the other?

[โ€“] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

That is not new, caffeine is an analog of ATP and known to affect serum cholesterol levels in the liver. Welcome to 1996.

Epidemiology is a fucking joke. We waste millions on studies making the same observations over and over then the media treats this like it's profound and new.

How many studies do we need to show obesity makes every disease worse or more prevalent?

How the fuck did they even control this study? Most people consume caffeine in one way or another. The one exception is Mormons, who actually have less disease than the typical population so this ๐Ÿ’ฉ can seriously fuck off and stop wasting money.

[โ€“] chisel@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe 100% of the positive-caffine-outcome people also snorted 100mg of adderall every morning?

[โ€“] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Stimulants improve test scores, which is why most students are on adderol one way or another.