this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
140 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

5767 readers
2349 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Habitual sloperator's anonymous. Seems like you have a reasonable application of an LLM, applied only when conditionally valuable. Alternatively you could ask a person to help and cut out the sloperation entirely.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I use pretrains light on slop, n-gram sampling, and a big banned strings list. And then I check the logprob synonyms on top of that, like so:

Not that it's particularly critical, as I’m actually reading and massaging really short outputs (usually less than ten words at a time). Better instruct models, which tend to be more sloppy, still aren’t so bad; nothing like ChatGPT.

So yeah, I’m aware of the hazard. But it’s not as bad as you’d think.

In fact, there are whole local-LLM communities dedicated to the science of slop. And mitigating it. It’s just not something you see in corporate UIs because they don’t care (other than a few bits they’ve stolen, like MinP sampling).

[–] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Liketearsinrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

ha thanks, was just curious

[–] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It seems a sophisticated approach that minimizes broad suggestion. It probably improves your writing momentum and reduces stalling like youve shared had been detrimental. As an exercise in writing, or practice for personal reflection i see the merit. Teaching oneself or developing strategies best learned when applied... Alright. Functional writing on technical topics or news, potentially bearable.

But like many comments in the thread, people dont want to read generated content. If there's disclosure about using an LLM in a novel's production i'll have little desire to read it.