this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
47 points (79.7% liked)
Progressive Politics
4034 readers
970 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If your reaction to this is outrage, you're politically juvenile. It's early 2026, this is exactly the time to be doing this kind of politics. If you already now signal to the Democratic Party establishment your capitulation, why should your concerns even be taken into account. Piker is putting the gun on the table at exactly the right time. Grow up.
Piker isn't doing anything. If you think what Hasan, the textbook champagne socialist does is political action, that explains a lot.
What a bizarre response. Nowhere did I claim that he's an organizer. Public political speech by a prominent political broadcast commentator (yea that's what "viral streaming influencer" used to be called in the 1900s) is ...not nothing. Saying he isn't doing anything is like saying that political speech doesn't do anything.
Edit: you added the champagne socialist bit. Do I look like I care about this guy personally? He's an influential political commentator that made a good point. In this thread it drew reactions from the "blu no matter whu" crowd and I called that out. That's it.
He isn't doing any kind of politics.
My sibling in christ, even virtue signaling is a kind of politics.
In the "everything is politics" definition sure. That's obviously not what I meant.
You're judging his internal state of mind and disposition. I don't give a flipping fuck about it right now. Even if he is just a champagne socialist virtue signaling, the objectively observable thing is "popular influencer is putting a political blackmail of the dem establishment in the discourse agenda". Even under your set of assumptions his champaign socialist virtue signaling is not without real political impact.
I mean fuck, an even shallower piece of nothing is sitting in the white house and his vapid brainfarts are for sure creating political impacts.
So yes, you genuinely believe this has political value.
That explains so much.
The passive aggressive "explains much" angle you have now repeated twice is kind of weird.
There's a weird cult around hating this one guy specifically, and people just cannot help but tell on themselves whenever he's mentioned. It's pathetic.
So weird that people hate on a wannabe tankie loser.
I guarantee that he does far more to push for progressive causes in a single year than you'll do in your entire lifetime.
That's it, keep simping for champagne socialist losers.
I'm not even a fan of the guy, I'm just not a fucking idiot
Wow you got me.
Hate the guy all you like. I'm not a fan either. But that's not what I was talking about. I was talking about the political point he made. You turned it into a debate about his character, and with the weird "explains much" shit, into a debate about my character. You could have said "that guy's a douche" and I'd have responded with "yup but the douche is making a good point". Instead you chose toxicity and vitriol. Maybe chill a bit.
What is this "good point" even supposed to be? That he'd hand the election to Vance? Wow, so brave.
See that's the problem. You've poisoned the space between us, I have no patience to engage with you further and have this discussion on the actual merits of the fucking political point which I would have liked to have in the first place. Do better by our community next time.
Poisoned it by directly asking what you think the "good point" is?
Clearly there was no substance there to begin with, if that's the case.
Do BeTtEr
Poisoned by repeatedly using the "explains a lot" passive aggression, since your very first response to me.
We're done.
Oh no, somebody called you out for cheering on a tankie loser and challenged you on what makes it a "good point".
So toxic, so poisoned.
Give me a break. Just leave if you're gonna leave.
You did a bad job of challenging or conversing. You have been singular sided the whole time.
You are toxic, at least specifically to this entire thread so far. And I am plenty happy to add to that so you maybe hear it.
Deleted by moderator