this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
111 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

788 readers
581 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

leo-point leo-point leo-point leo-point leo-point

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't believe this guy is a christian, wtf does he keep talking about the antichrist for

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 19 hours ago

He can't be christian, they'd have to construct a new circle of hell just for him.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The best thing about christianity is that it's exploitable by anyone, even non-christians!

I'm mostly joking but there's truth to the idea that most religions are pretty easy to take advantage of. Marx saw religion as an indicator of immiseration in his opiate of the masses quote but the sad truth of most religions is that the more accurately/fundamentally they're followed by their adherents the more evil the acts committed by those adherents in its name, except for the ones that don't really have a strict dogma to follow.

Judaism/Islam/Christianity, if followed to the letter, would have their followers kill so many people for silly reasons, the overwhelming majority just honestly don't follow them that closely because most people have an intuitive understanding of morals and ethics that these religions essentially try to override if followed too closely.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that isn't a biblical thing and just something. The only time the term is used is in reference to people that arent Christian with the implication they oppose him. Like a guy that's against Christ, or anti-christ. The whole son of Satan thing is fanfic

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is fanfic that derives from the book of revelations. They take the part that talks about a “great horn” that rises out of the beast with seven heads.

I’m rusty on the details, because I left the church almost 20 years ago now.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the evangelical antichrist is made up from the rider on the white horse and the beast from Revelation, and rando bits of Isaiah and Daniel for flavour. I think the term 'anti-christ' is initially used in Acts to describe the inquisitor-types like pre-Damascus Paul who was going around deconverting and/or killing people