this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
1126 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
3884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

As opposed to a private for-profit company run by friends of the people in government?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

At least the private company would act in their own interest to preserve profits. Trump will gladly blow the whole thing up regardless of consequences just to feed his ego. Like with the tariffs.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

Not an american but personally i would most definitely prefer an absolute fuckwad with little self control in charge than an evil mastermind entity hellbent on squeezing me for every cent.

The former is too stupid not to ruin his lever of power, which would cause the system to decentralize and/or contribute to said fuckwad's downfall. The latter employs a huge amount of people specifically trained to maintain and increase the amount of profits extracted while maintaining their stranglehold.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

At least the private company would act in their own interest to preserve profits

Such as sharing ALL of its customer data with the government in exchange for subsidies? Which effectively means having a government entity in control of the data but with zero oversight or control from the public?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's not ideal but at least people aren't getting their credit cancelled because they said something mean about Trump online.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah? You mean it'd be independent of Trump's interference? Like US TikTok?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I already said it wasn't ideal. At least Trump had to do some shit first to fuck with tiktok. You think that wouldn't have been immediate if tiktok was controlled by the government?

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No, I don't think so. Because - up until Trump - people in governments know that if they pull shit like this off, they risk the same shit being pulled against them, after they're gone and the opposition takes over.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago

And Trump has proven that reasoning invalid. Things are never going back to the way they were before now that he's shown just how much you can get away with. Until mechanisms are put in place to prevent such corruption and deal with his kind we can't trust the government to handle anything.