News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
In case anyone was wondering what side your local government is on. It doesn't matter what your mayor says, or city council, it matters what the police do, and they are generally entirely insulated from those that supervise them. The power dynamics are off, the ones with power over city police are instead captured by the police. We hire dirty local politicians usually too, which makes them even more susceptible to police departments that are often run by fascists in even our progressive cities. In many cases coordinating with paramilitary groups in training, like the pround boys and their ilk during the protests.
The police need to be brought to heel in our blue cities.
It does matter what side your local government is on. AGs, judges, sheriffs, and more are all elected. That's how you get people in the right places to get these charges dropped.
The police departments of the city are a force unto themselves, removed from accountability from the ones that have control over them. When is the last time there was a wholesale makeover of police leadership? Never, they may change the director, the chief, commissioners, they don't change the officers up and down the line, not in portland, not in berkely, not in chicago, not even after they are found to be collaberating with fascists, and betraying their duty.
As to the state's attorneys, they are the enemy.
I'm in Alabama and a small town just fired all of its police because of corruption and etc, that was a pretty wild story
Well portland oregon, berkely ca chicago, and other large cities are progressive and have fascist police departments untouchable by their local governments in fact even if not in law. Why is that? We should be wondering why, not denying the obvious. Why anyone would want to cover for fascists controlling big city police departments untouchable by their elected officials I don't know, but here we are.
That said, that sounds interesting about the alabama thing, I think I might have seen a blip in the news about that even, trying to remember. I've been too angry to really read the news like I used to honestly, because reasons.
https://vocal.media/motivation/the-camden-experiment-how-a-city-fired-its-entire-police-force-to-save-itself
I remember hearing about that one back in the day. My point though, the police generally are unaccountable, local leaders are themselves corrupt and therefore unwilling, but above that mostly unable, to check police departments.
Any time a reformer gets elected for a prosecuting attorney, or occassionally sherriff, the old boy network mobilizes to take them out, very aggressively, not always successfully to remove them, but it does stop the reform from spreading.
The police, and courts, are captured by an aristocracy raised to have nothing but contempt for the other tribes, and all of those below them in social status. We have elections but we don't use them, most prosecutors and judges run unopposed, and both parties being the same is never more true than it is with them. These same people run under/with a party because that's where they can win, many would be with the other team if that team were in control in that area.
Look at the minneapolis prosecutors, they can get tough with poor people, but federal agents execute their citizens under false pretense, on video, we have irrefutable evidence, and they refuse to cover the shield of law over their own citizens. They are not our friends, and the only way they will do anything is if they are forced to, and then they will make a perfunctionary effort to say they did, and throw the case if they can.
Well, then why did you retoricly ask,
Exception to the rule obviously. Or retoricly as you might say.
Yep, you can tell by how the prosecutors went out of their way to bullshit about how the police were totally justified in arresting these people in the first place
Also how they let protesters twist in the wind for as long as possible
Also also,
Good to see that protesters and voters were able to force these prosecutors to do the right thing, but the whole system is still completely fucked