this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
165 points (97.7% liked)
196
5653 readers
1326 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do not get this at all. Is it AI generated?
40 years ago, Akinator would be called AI. Basically a fuzzy logic system that classifies 5-level inputs among millions of characters/animals/objects, with both overt and less-obvious machine learning plus moderation.
I’m referring to the text “we are Charlie kirk”. The sentence makes no sense.
That's user-submitted content. Whenever Akinator fails to guess, it asks you to identify the character so it can improve itself, and will have you type its name if it's new. The subtitle is to differentiate characters who have the same name. Example: Monika / President of Doki Doki Literature Club. But some people write jokes there. This one is a real slogan of a movement, but isn't funny and should be removed. The moderators are busy removing overt racism, homophobia and approving characters' avatars though. Still, you can suggest a change of the name/subtitle if you finish the game.
Idk what their stance on genAI is, for example whether they allow generated avatars or if they allow bots to improve the question bank, but they worked well before 2020.
No AI, just good old programming. Akinator was made long before AI slopified thinking.
Isn't it AI in classic means, not generative ai
It is a kind of fuzzy logic and machine learning system, basically 1970s tech but with lots of user-submitted data. Definitely would be called AI up until like 2010 but the constant evolution of the term because of tech improvement and hype keeps turning once cutting-edge AI into "well yeah, computers can do that".
The image or the flash game Akinator? Akinator is a 20 Questions device that's basically just been hooked up to a fandom wiki. You could buy handheld toys that did the same thing in the 90's just without the the pop culture awareness.
The image most likely is just a simple photoshop.
It hasn't been hooked up to a fandom wiki, it just feels like it. The authors just grinded to create a decent matrix of questions and characters until the product became good enough to be fun, at which point users happily answered irrelevant questions here and there to add to the knowledge. They also had users add new characters and submit questions, snowballing it into a giant "machine-learned" yes/no-question-based knowledge base.
Yeah I'm realizing now this is basically a LLM but reversed because it asks questions and you give responses. The responses are all value weighted
No, it's not a language model. It does not process any language, the question strings are static descriptions of the weighted values.
If Akinator had a language model, it would never ask "is your character a sea animal" after you said No to "is your character an animal" because you've ruled out the bigger set. But it does ask such questions, which means it can't even notice the basic linguistic operation where adding a qualifier creates a subset. It just doesn't know the answer to the broader question for some of the currently most probable characters, just the answer to the narrower, at which point it will ask the latter to rule some out even if it's clear to a human that one implies the other.
You're right. I should have said "neural network" or algorithm or something. I didn't mean to play it up, I mean those are generally more rudimentary than people think they are.
But I think it's backtracking on questions like that because it expects people to give wrongful answers or to change their minds. Also some answers actually require you to give a lead at first then contradict yourself later like that in order to reach. Like "Mary Madeleine's Skull relic" instead of just "a skull"
Yeah, that's definitely part of it. I think it reduces the weights of earlier questions as the game progresses.
Also, it seems to have memory between games: if you answered "yes" to a very specific question, it is way more likely to ask it in the next game. This is because it's hard to think of completely original characters each time: if one's first character was a British politician, the next one is very likely to be British and/or a politician.
It does! I'm curious if it's using that memory from games with your specific IP address or with other people who played recently
Almost correct except this is a real answer.
Crazy to find that out. Spent a while messing with the thing again, it adds new answers in almost immediately. Also since a bunch of people started trying to prompt it to suggest Charlie's bullet, it started guessing it often
Ok i completely forgot about that game. I probably played it once. But I was more referring to the very very strange English in the picture.
Oh interesting