this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
284 points (98.3% liked)

News

36966 readers
1757 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of the biggest unions, the UAW, was already openly planning and preparing for a general strike on may 1st 2028 (planned before trump won the election), but it's likely we'll have to move that up. The point is, the will is there, we just need unions to collaborate, plan, and prepare.

All of the calls for one before were usually never by actual unions, as most mainstream unions are afraid to engage in one due to the taft-heartley act, and there just wasn't the will to engage in that battle, nor were many of them preparing for it due to most unions losing their radical spirit in favor of small wage gains.

But the quick descent into fascism is seemingly finally waking them up to the need to organize one, which is happening.

I'm not saying it'd be a bad idea to prepare in other ways if the strike fails, but realize that unless there's a fracturing of the military that joins the resistance, any violent resistance would have to be extremely limited to an Irish Troubles style at best, as anything more direct would be an open slaughter.

A violent turn would also mean losing the participation of non-violent resistance as it becomes too dangerous, leaving only a minority of militants willing to continue. I'd highly recommend reading this article, which explores the downsides of turning away from non-violent resistance.