this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
95 points (98.0% liked)
Slop.
812 readers
395 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

It's the one who got lw to do the rule saying flat earthers should be treated the same as scientists. They probably would end up reading pragerU type stuff (cause idk how else could think Reagan did good)
Hold up lol what?!
https://lemmy.world/post/24135976?scrollToComments=true
Then used the example "you should allow flat earthers to hold weight or you're just doing a echo chamber"
Best was was they walked it back but never clarified
Edit. Oh right forgot it was one way they were trying to use these rules to counter ml and pro Palestinian content/comments
https://lemmy.world/post/24135976/14436261?sort=Controversial
The purpose is to allow pinholes through echo chambers with the idea that the odd antivax comment is easier to deal with than the odd “Russia is waging a war of aggression” comment in a pro-Russia community.
One of those stances requires a black box with other ideas kept out or it collapses. That has recently been done with heavy, heavy moderation banning large numbers of people. That’s the kind of moderation we’re looking to rein in.
I’ve focused on the most controversial examples, because to some people (if they’re acting genuinely), that’s what it might look like to them. If you want a flat earth community, that’s fine, as long as you allow people to call it out as a joke once in a while.
The purpose is to encourage discussion where it’s most needed, usually where moderators are preventing it.
2nd edit, I regret looking more at their account again. So much being angrier at people dissatisfied with dnc and daring to criticize it than what is actually happening, then so much Israeli talking points when people bring up Israeli war crimes 🤮
Absolute nerd shit. Imagine making this your hobby
Hobby, right.
Idk which one would be preferable at this point (for that account/lw in general)
The marketplace of ideas framework has done so much damage to society. If an idea is by all ability to determine illegitimate (e.g. flat earth), you still need to have ways to challenge that ruling just as a procedural issue for scientific inquiry, but you do not need to let people repeating the same bullshit arguments do so at all, and in fact it is basically just as important to stamp them out of your spaces.
Lmao skip reading a book and throw them in a re-education school to re-teach them k-12 with extra critical thinking
Immean gonna be even more necessary with all the cuts to education funding AND requirements. who needs accreditation, it must be bad since it won't let our non school homeschooling or Christian private schools count as education