this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
436 points (99.1% liked)

politics

28058 readers
2759 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well sounds like the Democratic leadership to aggressively court disgruntled voters and listening and addressing their concerns is off to a great start with this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But the side that mostly follows the rules is also just handing the cheating side unearned Victoria over and over again.

Scummer is rolling over on his already shitty appeasement offer.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Shumer's perspective is to try and get what he realistically can get. He could stand his ground and say "defund ICE" but it would have 0% chance of success. He believes if he can negotiate and get even 1 of 10 requests fulfilled, then that is better than nothing. With Republicans having the government trifecta, there is little leverage to get any concessions.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No, it's not his perspective. He's not fighting for Us. He's an awful fucking negotiator. He gives his "final offer" as his opening bid, then continues to negotiate against himself from there.

He thinks he's safe from the jackboots. And is willing to throw the rest of us to the wolves to maintain that illusion.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

He gives his "final offer" as his opening bid, then continues to negotiate against himself from there.

Normally I would agree with you, but shooting high with demands largely just leaves the right being unwilling to even talk about negotiating. This is what they did with the original 10 demands Democrats made.

https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/ridiculous-republicans-reject-dems-10-demands-for-dhs-reforms

Proposals put forward have to be tempting enough to pull individual Republicans to negotiate.

He thinks he's safe from the jackboots.

He's gotten multiple threats on his life including bomb threats to his office in December. He is very aware he isn't safe.