World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
She's absolutely not what Japan needed. Conservatives are less unhinged than their US counterparts but they wont do what's needed for Japan to survive. Their aging population voted for this as they get unreasonably spooked by immigration when their country needed it the most (Japan's immigration is already very low). They'll gradually fall into corruption and irrelevance in the next few decades if they don't wake up or worse if there's a war.
Part of the problem is that some of the LDP's base thought they weren't conservative enough and started voting for other parties, so the LDP decided to appeal to them. Of course, this is just short-term thinking to maintain power at all costs and is gonna fuck the country in the long-run unless they get their act together.
The majority of the Seats are FPTP, so it's a common trend to chase the crazies.
I think we need to blame voters less and systems more, all non-proportional system have a rightwards shift built in.
In theory this could work leftwardly but as these countries tend to depend heavily on capitalist media to tell voters who is capable of winning in their district, the leftward shift is usually described as unrealistic & impossible, whereas the right shift is usually exaggerated and considered a real threat to the center-right/center-left.
You see the same effect in the UK, US, Russia (when they had elections), etc.
Whereas Ireland, Scandanvia, tend to have stable liberal-to-progressive governments rather than flip between a center-left & center-right establishment party that is constantly chasing far right voters.
I think the best system to counteract this is STV (used in Ireland) as it:
Their demographics are crashing, young people are not having kids, or waiting until far later in life, and her solution, as far as I’ve heard, is “bitch you gotta max that grindset, 100h weeks are for closers”. Which is just leaning further into the already insane work culture of Japan.
They're going to kill themselves, MMW what remains of their young will try to move to other countries and they'll be over. It's just sad.
You don't know Japan.
Young voters absolutely love Sanae: https://archive.ph/IooOg
It's possible for both things to be true isn't it?
Your source mentions that she is popular with young people but that her party is not popular with young people. It also mentions that young people don't have a high voter turnout. With Japans aging population and the information in your link, that could still mean that she is popular with young people but the net effect from young voters is still tiny. I couldn't find any good sources for actually breaking down the demographics of her popularity though.
Also, why do a hit on run on someone trying to answer a question, and not take a shot at the question itself, or let people know why you didn't try to answer the question?
The earlier comment made it out to seem like it was just the older people who voted for her. Saying that young ones vote for her too is a good correction
Agreed. Depending on what portion of turn out though, I'm just not sure it necessarily fits behind the lead "you don't know Japan". And with that lead, it seemed like there was more to say about what Japan is actually like.
That said, they're likely Japanese with far better English skills than I have in Japanese and I'm possibly being overly harsh
Young voters in Japan are less informed than young voters in literally every other developed country.
I never said they don't, with time they'll realise they f'ed themselves.