this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
319 points (99.1% liked)

Buy European

9452 readers
706 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Because it's ubiquitous, allows headphones without needing charged, and allows movement around the jack as opposed to the USB c port.

It's a great design and the best part is that if it's included it doesn't preclude anyone from using Bluetooth headphones if they so choose.

[โ€“] idlesheep@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

I understand why some people have use for the 3.5 mm jack, what I don't understand is why in the world you would ever let that be the one thing that stops you from choosing an otherwise great phone.

You are artificially limiting your choice to an extreme degree over a feature that only a microscopic minority of people care about, and one that you can easily get over by either using a dongle or usb-c headphones.

The only thing you can't do is charge the device while using said headphones (unless they have wireless charging but let's assume they don't), but even then phones charge so fast to 50% these days that I never found this to be an actual problem. Unless you're listening to music non-stop for like 10 hours straight, but that seems unlikely.

It just feels so absurd to me that people hammer on and on about how this is an insurmountable deal breaker. I happily use my wired IEMs with my Pixel phone every day and never once have I felt like I'm losing out on anything.

[โ€“] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (8 children)
  1. using a cumbersome dongle introduces a single point of failure for a port which is required to stay us able for your phone to function
  2. using a dongle introduces a single point of failure for your ability to listen to things, so you'd better hope you only have one pair of headphones, or that you never misplace tiny wires.
  3. using a dongle is an additional cost to purchasing the phone
  4. it's a matter of principle, as it is a symptom of the continuing enshittification of all modern life.
  5. using wireless headphones depletes two batteries at once.
  6. Sure, don't like a 3.5mm jack, despite the backwards compatibility with older headphones? Fine, but there is no good reason I can think of for there not to just be a second USB port down there. Additional data ports are good, and allow the device to be used for even more flexible, niche purposes, beyond being a redundancy against a single point of failure.
[โ€“] idlesheep@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

What you say is valid in theory, but in practice I have really not seen it pan out. In the end I still cannot fathom rejecting 90% of phone on the market, hampering everything I want from a phone, just to make an empty statement about a port almost nobody uses.

I've had my current phone for almost 4 years, I have wired headphones (so I'm already a minority), I have only had 1 dongle which I use everyday with it, and everything is completely fine and shows no signs of changing. The phone's battery is so much more likely to die before the usb port ever does.

It just seems like an issue that has been clearly solved and I see no reason to ruin all your phone choices over it.

[โ€“] Honytawk@feddit.nl 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Dude. The people rejecting 90% of the phone market aren't doing it to make a statement. They are the people using the damn port. Every single one of them.

They wouldn't be complaining if they didn't use it themselves.

[โ€“] idlesheep@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Definitely not every single one of them since I use "the damn port" too. That's the point I'm making. This has not stopped me or anyone from using any phone.

The people who are complaining seem to be complaining not because they must have a 3.5 mm port, but because they don't accept any existing solutions (dongle/usb-c headphones) to use the usb-c port with their existing wired devices.

That's fine, of course, everyone is entitled to not like something, but it just seems very illogical to me to be such a hardliner on something that has so many alternatives, and instead choose to barely have any phone choices.

I won't comment further since it's clear most people here really hate this change and I can't grasp that since I use my wired headphones with my phone all day with no issue, I was just trying to understand the logic behind limiting yourself so much when you have alternatives.

I hope you have a good day.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)