this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
177 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42718 readers
422 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
177
One-third of consumers don't want AI on their devices, report finds, and it's not because they don't understand it: They just don't need it (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 months ago by ryujin470@fedia.io to c/technology@beehaw.org
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The problem with AI isn't that it's not been clearly explained. The problem is, it sucks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] electrotabby@piefed.social 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

An operating system should only be infrastructure to keep programs running. If I want an AI program, I'll seek it out and get it myself.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

what do you mean you don't want an LLM built into the kernel that controls the scheduler?

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

Right? Why would you bake it in?