this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
132 points (83.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

2012 readers
220 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah, they're thugs. If people lack the imagination to realize thugs can can be white that sounds like a them problem to me.

Honestly, this reads almost as "they're not thugs, they are white so it's just policing as usual and that makes it alright". I'm assuming the post is trying to say cops are bad, but if the white authoritarian racist would agree 100% with your statement maybe consider reformulating.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tbf this goes both ways though. This administration has conditioned me to assume "masked thugs" & "gang members" = "the good guys"

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Also, ICE isn't exclusively white people

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Also a bunch of ICE are not white people so it makes even less sense.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Of course thugs can be white, but the term is used almost exclusively for black people.

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Sorry, but I'll have to disagree with you on that. The term is frequently used around the UK when referring to violent people of any background, but the context in which I hear it the most is football hooligans or EDL. I wouldn't be surprised if those adding a racial bias to the word are from the US. Europe is generally not as preoccupied with race.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

That's your bias. I had no issue imagining white thugs. In fact there are so little black people where I live that I wouldn't associate them as thugs. Poor? Sure, that's social conditioning, but thugs no.

Calling ICE thugs is appropriate, albeit maybe too light. They are the KKK trash. That sounds more appropriate than Gestapo.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because it's constantly used by Fox News?

It's an old word and people have different connotations. I personally associate it with union busters and railroad bulls.