this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
52 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

11262 readers
683 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We talked about the possibility of an election, likelyhood and risk in another thread yesterday. With party and leader numbers like these... maybe it's more likely than I thought.

Src

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The party with the most potential to reach that entrenched conservative vote is the NDP. If they can show working class voters that they're the ones really fighting for them, they have an opportunity to make big inroads.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would like to believe that's true, but I'm not convinced that it is.

The Conservatives had an entrenched 30-33% of the vote, all the way through the Layton years.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

Sure, and the Liberals have always had their entrenched numbers too.

If you believe that the entire Canadian electorate is fundamentally unchangeable, then you're basically arguing that there's no point in third parties even existing. We are doomed to endlessly rock back and forth between Cons and Libs forever, and nothing can be done about it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

True but there's an argument to be made that by the time of Layton, the NDP had already abandoned its unabashed pro-worker agenda for a neolib-lite one with social progs characteristics. Check this from 2011. It could easily be a LPC platform. Their 2006 platform was similar. Today NDP leadership campaigns talk about workers, worker rights, unions, jobs programs, democratizing workplaces, new crown corps, etc. Not saying it's guaranteed to shake workers from PP's grip, but that there's a notable shift in policy proposals and focus. That said the NDP arose from the needs of unionists and socialist farmers where the current con hotbed is so perhaps there's a chance.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah, there's this obsessive nostalgia around Layton that tends to blind people to the fact that he wasn't the progressive socialist hero that everyone has recast him as in their minds.

[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, and it was actually the NDP that the Conservatives got a lot of vote share from, despite a lot of people assuming the Liberals got NDP votes.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never said both didn't happen, but the important metric is how seats flipped (since afaik there's no info on individual vote intention changes)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Canadian_federal_election#Seats_that_changed_hands

Liberals gained 7 from NDP, Conservatives gained 10 from NDP.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't mean to say you're wrong.