this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
418 points (98.8% liked)

News

37132 readers
1626 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic representative Jamie Raskin, of Maryland, has slammed the Department of Justice’s release of the Epstein files as “a full-blown cover-up”.

Asked on CNN this morning whether Democrats were going to see to the unredacted files, Raskin said, “Absolutely.”

"We sent them a letter and so we’re demanding a right to do it. I hope the Department of Justice will keep its word and let us in there."

A reminder that US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche said on Friday that every woman’s image had been redacted, adding that if any members of Congress wanted to see the unredacted material they should contact the DOJ so that could be arranged.

Raskin went on:

"Remember, they’ve said there are six million potentially responsive documents there. They’ve only released three million with more than 10,000 redactions. So we have to go look at those redactions. They’ve not sent us the explanation yet for those redactions. But then what about the other 3 million files?"

"Because we are witnessing a full blown cover up. Remember, not only is there a subpoena to attorney general [Pam] Bondi to turn everything over to Congress now; there’s a federal law compelling them to turn it over, and yet we’re just getting the dribs and drabs of information coming out of this stuff that they want us to see."

To the suggestion that three million files was not “nothing”, Raskin added:

"Well it’s close to nothing when they’re deciding which documents are coming out and there’s a federal law and a subpoena compelling them to just turn everything over to Congress."

"And they said that they had done this process many months ago, and there’s nothing to see there."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

... What do you mean?

Are you saying that the corporate / political pedophiles ... don't functionally deserve the death penalty?

Or are you saying because I, myself, a currently crippled person, who doesn't own (and can't afford) a firearm... sn't volunteering myself as a viable triggerman, that makes me a hypocrite?

I lack the means and the opportunity.

There are tens of millions of gunowners in this country, I am commenting on how ludicrous it is that in this highly armed society full of people drastically more capable and better equipped to do take the shot, nobody has yet.

Instead, we get a mass casualty incident at a school every week, or at a church, or some other public area.

It is ridiculous to me that in a country full of suicidal mass shooters, none of them pick worthwhile targets.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Are you saying that the corporate / political pedophiles … don’t functionally deserve the death penalty?

I wouldn't mourn them but I don't believe an ethical criminal justice system executes its own people, no. I also don't believe any criminal justice system performs executions via a gunshot to the face so lets not pretend that's what you were talking about.

Or are you saying because I, myself, a currently crippled person, who doesn’t own (and can’t afford) a firearm…

Guns are surprisingly cheap. And considering that if you decided to be an assassin your life would be effectively (or perhaps literally) over, it's not like you would need your other possessions anymore. If you were serious you'd sell them. You're not. You're waxing rhetoric about how someone, anyone, who isn't you should do this for you.

sn’t volunteering myself as a viable triggerman, that makes me a hypocrite?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

There are tens of millions of gunowners in this country, I am commenting on how ludicrous it is that in this highly armed society full of people drastically more capable and better equipped to do take the shot, nobody has yet.

2 people have tried to assassinate Trump. They failed, and it's doubtful if the one who survived will ever be released from prison. That alone is a pretty compelling reason why nobody else wants to try.

It is ridiculous to me that in a country full of suicidal mass shooters, none of them pick worthwhile targets.

Those people are mentally ill. They don't want to change the world, they want to get a high score.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok so you've clearly got 0 experience with firearms if you think someone who needs a wheelchair on a bad day, and crutches or a cane on a good day...

... is of comparable fitness and capability to wield a firearm, you know, with the intent to surivive the encounter, as an able bodied person.

Uh lets see here, specifics;

Ok I also don't believe in a codified death penalty.

But I believe its the only solution for the people who the system will never touch, because they are its prime operators.

A well done firing squad execution is probably actually more humane than death by lethal injection or gas chamber, guess you don't know much about how that actually works either.

Your blathering about me being of disingenuous motivation is completely pointless... I am crippled. No amount of me selling things would make me capable of the task.

It is infact possible to survive and even escape an assasination. Luigi survived his. Others in the past have escaped totally.

You seem to just think it is impossible to do this. Extremely difficult? Yes. Impossible? No.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Ok so you’ve clearly got 0 experience with firearms if you think someone who needs a wheelchair on a bad day, and crutches or a cane on a good day…

I own several guns and there's guys in wheelchairs at the range that shoot better than I do. Convenient excuse, though.

A well done firing squad execution is probably actually more humane than death by lethal injection or gas chamber, guess you don’t know much about how that actually works either.

I know they aim for center mass and not the face. I apparently know more about it than you do.

I am crippled. No amount of me selling things would make me capable of the task.

Then why bring up your finances in the first place?

It is infact possible to survive and even escape an assasination. Luigi survived his.

And he's probably going to spend the rest of his life in prison. Sounds awesome, who doesn't want that for themselves?

Others in the past have escaped totally.

If you call being hunted forever "escaping"

You seem to just think it is impossible to do this.

I don't think it's impossible. I think you asked why somebody doesn't do it and I gave you a myriad of reasons why they don't.