PC Gaming

13642 readers

511 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

-34

PC gamers win the first battle against Valve Corporation as £656m competition claim receives judicial approval (milberg.co.uk)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The UK specialist competition tribunal has certified the £656m legal claim against Valve brought by children’s rights campaigner, Vicki Shotbolt. This marks a significant first victory for the class of around 14 million PC gamers against Valve – the owner of popular gaming platform, Steam.

The claim alleges that Valve has abused its dominant position in the PC gaming market under UK competition law by imposing excessive commission charges and anti-competitive restrictions on game developers selling gaming titles on the Steam platform.

These excessive commission charges are passed onto consumers by way of increased prices for PC games and in-game content.

Ms Shotbolt, the class representative, asserts that Valve’s conduct has increased the prices of games across the entire market. Therefore the class is not limited to Steam users but also includes purchasers of PC games and downloadable content on other gaming platforms and distribution channels.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am surprised how easily people are siding with Valve. I say this as someone who's last console was the SEGA and is happy to see Valve improve Linux gaming.

That being said the 30% fee cut is clearly only possible due to lack of competition. In a competitive market, the cut would go down to service cost + some margin (subject to competition).

I don't believe Valve or any other platform providers ever argued around economic reasoning for choosing specifically 30.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lack of competition? WTF are you even talking about?

You've got Epic, GoG, itch.io, and not to mention publisher specific storefronts like origin, ubisoft's whatever the hell launcher for PC.

That's plenty of competition, it's just that they suck at actual competition or are comfortable in their niche market.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

That’s plenty of competition, it’s just that they suck at actual competition or are comfortable in their niche market.

I am not talking about the mere presence of competing entities. I am talking about market forces (in the real sense). If they were subject to market, they would not be able to charge an arbitrary 30% (because this figure would undercut to gain market share).