this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
1063 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

10442 readers
3390 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Veganism is not a boycott. Here's the commonly-accepted definition of veganism from the Vegan Society:

Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

It is practically a boycott though, since a purpose of a boycott is to avoid something that is unethical. With veganism you're refusing to purchase (or obtain in other ways, but 99% of people purchase) products that involve animal exploitation. For BDS you're refusing to purchase products that involve Palestinian exploitation. For most others you're refusing to purchase products that involve other forms of human exploitation like slave labor, like with the chocolate industry, battery mining, sweatshops, etc. (Nestle being a common example)

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 3 points 11 hours ago

At best, a boycott is part of veganism. Vegans obviously also don't personally kill animals to eat, or kick puppies, or have cock fights. Not supporting those things financially is a consequence of that stance, not it's sole purpose.

The reason it seems like a boycott is simply because for the average city dweller, buying animal products is simply the main way they interact with this form of oppression.

To try an analogy: Imagine most/all men actually not assaulting or raping women. But, 99% of them pay for others to do that on their behalf, three times a day. Feminism would look a lot like "just a boycott" to these people simply because consumption is their main point of exposure/support of anti-feminism.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No, a boycott is withholding purchase to get a company to change. For example most people observing BDS would have no problem buying mcdonalds if they are no longer part of the occupation. The problem isn't the product but how it's obtained. With vegans the problem is the product and no amout of "free range" or "no chick killing" is gonna have us buy dairy or eggs.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The product is "food", the problem is animal abuse. Would vegans have a problem with buying a vegan bigmac?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on the vegan and other circumstance I suppose. I would on BDS grounds and that even a vegan bigmac still supports one of the largest cow murdering corporations there is. I don't understand the point of a "vegan" bigmac and having mcdonalds not be part of the palestinian or cow genocide means it would functionally be a completely different entity bearing only the name due to historical reasons. Like Nintendo the playing cards company and Nintendo the videogames company.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but that more or less also goes for Israel.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Olives from pissrael or spain are still olives. A "vegan" bigmac is a different product from the "original".

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Yes, the goal of a boycott is to encourage/force change through economic means. BDS buying Israeli olives would require either the olives somehow be fully separate from the entire rest of the Israeli market (which, if the target is not McD specifically but the meat industry as a whole, a vegan bigmac would fit) or about the same level of change to Israel as McD becoming vegan only. It's roughly analogous, is the point.