this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
197 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

52761 readers
230 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did Bill Gates really have 0 ability to get antibiotics in secret except to ask Epstein for them, in writing?

Like he didn’t even have real life employees on NDAs he could pay to figure this out for him?

Even tho he has unlimited money he’s still completely powerless to get himself secret antibiotics and has to pop Epstein an email?

Why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 90 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He didn't.

The email at the center of the viral post was not written by Bill Gates. It was written by Jeffrey Epstein — to himself.

Both the “From” and “To” fields list Epstein’s personal Gmail address. The message appears to be a draft, written during a period when Epstein’s relationship with Gates had deteriorated. In it, Epstein alleges that Gates asked him to delete messages related to an STD. But the document does not show Gates making that request, nor does it provide independent confirmation that any of the claims are true.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is one of the difficulties with these releases - assessing the credibility of the information in each document is difficult. In this case, what you've just revealed might be obvious to anyone reviewing the actual document, but clearly no one is bothered doing that, and just assumes someone else will.

As the accusations pile up and no one does anything about any of it, the prevailing assumption is that none of it is reliable - of course the reality is that there must be dozens of identifiable witnesses who have or will provide testimony.

If I were the Trump Admin's PR boss, I'd probably be making posts containing fake Epstein documents, just to undermine the credibility of anything claiming to be an Epstein release.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Like all the incredibly salacious but unsubstantiated docs from when he was running for or already president that were included in this dump. Poison the well so none of it gets taken for truth.