this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
387 points (98.3% liked)

politics

27924 readers
3120 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The question has been framed in the streets: is a government that impoverishes healthcare and nutrition, flouts the law, enriches its officials, imprisons babies, and kills its citizens worth the money it collects, much less the respect and obedience it demands?

Democrats have nothing to lose by shutting down the government to force the majority party to respond to these questions and the one that looms over all: what, if any, is the political and moral future of the US?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

At the very least the DNC needs to go, that is a non-negotiable truth at this point.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Specially the RNC branch of the DNC. Specially important to not allow people with repeated last names or family ties to be president. There's plenty of last names that haven't had a turn at being president. Also we need a woman president and quick!

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There is no RNC branch of the DNC.

Also we need a woman president and quick!

Are you serious?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Very serious. The RNC branch with all their ballot conspiracy and murderous actions should step aside so that someone can fix their mess. Like when Gramps spills a glass of milk on the table because he soiled himself. Grandpa RNC just needs his fox news and a few pills. The rest of us gotta clean that shit up and move on...don't let Gramp's back in the kitchen. The shit economy is going to shit because of the RNC branch. Hopefully we get women candidates that are not crazy pedophiles. No more white guys for president unless we vote for them... We as in all of us not some representative assholes that the RNC can just gerrymander to get the votes they need. Stay out of the government and out of our neighborhoods.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The "evil DNC" ran two women. Progressives refused to vote for either. Funnily enough, an old white man did win.

. The RNC branch with all their ballot conspiracy

What ballot conspiracy?

murderous actions

Again, what?

Gramps

I find it amusing when old age suddenly becomes no big deal when we're talking about Bernie.

The shit economy is going to shit because of the RNC branch.

The economy is shit because of Republicans and their idiotic tariffs. It was growing under Biden, not really sure how this criticism makes sense.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The “evil DNC” ran two women. Progressives refused to vote for either. Funnily enough, an old white man did win.

And yet progressives have hated Biden since always. The constant racism disguised as "gaffes from crazy uncle Joe-- he just doesnt understand that he's flirting with KKK types" and his authoring civil asset forfeiture to pantomime some tough on crime shtick, and his money stream form AIPAC showed anyone that was paying attention that he was an absolute idiot. Sure some progressives votes for him in 2000 to get rid of trump, but that was because they had little choice in the matter. The "uncommitted" vote in 2024 in the dem primary was all progressives too.

Hillary lost because of the rage around her shanking Bernie in the primary. Kamala lost because she wouldnt disavow her support for genocide and flirting with right wingers to keep progressive voices down. if you want to distill that down to simply them being female and no other reason, I guess good luck with that-- live in whatever fantasy world you need to in order to keep from experiencing any cognitive dissonance. I'm beyond caring about other peoples accusations. This is a "you" problem.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But the RNC can stay, we're cool with them apparently.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No but nobody is deluded about the RNC being better except maga cult members (don't take my word for it, look at the polling) and I think we can all agree reaching them is a waste of time vs organizing around creating an actual opposition party.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No but nobody is deluded about the RNC being better

Ok, so discourage people from voting for Democrats, what happens? You support the worse (not by a little by the way, by a TON) option.

creating an actual opposition party.

Just like in 2016 and 2024. We'll just make sure the government stays in Republican hands until we create out mythical perfect party. We're so smart.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You have such a tiny worldview, but whatever go on believing that, people like you are becoming an endangered species. Your ideology allows for no change, everything is perfectly fragile and if we make any move to demand better we will certainly shatter it all as far as you are concerned.

Save your breath and get out of the way.