politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
So why give it a time limit? I guess that's the part I find incredibly self defeating. Why not say "The general strike starts on * " and let it go from there?
Look, just three weeks ago, complainers were bitching that Americans were too complacent, and a general strike would never happen. Now, a general strike is happening, and you're complaining that it's only a day? Even this was allegedly unthinkable at New Year's!
We don't know the future. Let the momentum build.
Gotta shift those goalposts.
I'm sure if we ever manage to organize a national, indefinite strike, there will still be people like this saying it's not real action so it's irrelevant.
Some people won't be happy until they see bodies of dead Americans in a bloody civil war, but they just don't have the courage to come out and say it.
There weren't enough dead bodies in that civil war!
Because the national momentum is going to fizzle out quickly if there's no end in sight and no concrete achievable demand.
I will assume you are asking genuinely, but I hope you realize that every step that has prepared people to strike has been disparaged by people saying "not enough!"
I don't think such a strong yet peaceful resistance to ICE could have happened without the series of No Kings protests.
I don't think that the statewide strike could have happened without the persistent yet peaceful protest and resistance.
I don't think the national one day strike could happen tomorrow without some evidence of it being successful and effective at the state-level, which it was.
An ongoing strike will be more likely to be successful if it follows a series of one day strikes. Yet a certain contingent cries "forever national strike now", as if that can manifest itself just by saying it. So I'm sorry if you're taking heat for a genuine concern, but it follows a long line of other users questioning if any action is "enough".
In the realm of strike action, it's like rotating strikes for an industry or work-to-rule instead of going directly to an all out work stoppage. These are tools you need to take time and prepare to use, and use them effectively. America's not used to resisting the federal apparatus en masse like this in decades. Allow people some time and training. And I don't imagine tomorrow will be the last day people decide to take action to resist the Trump admin.
No one can commit to infinite execution independently, and no one can commit others to a cause either. Why complain that a protest ends too soon and is therefore pointless instead of advocating to extend and expand the protests?