Look, I get it - accountability is clearly not your strong suit and so your natural instinct is to cover your tracks and lie about things but that's not how I do it.

What tracks am I covering. What did I lie about?

If it's character assassination, wanna explain how that works? Am I doing a character assassination by naming an account that is yours as being yours? Help me to connect the dots here because I literally cannot square the circle in a charitable way - the only way I can make sense of this is if you're trying to say that accusing a person of being you is such a heinous accusation to level at someone lmao.

You said the zr0 account is mine. It is not. And yes, conflating someone with someone else, when that other character is bad, is a form of character assassination. Not to mention that it's a shitty practice to randomly accuse people of sockpuppetry just to hate on them.

I admit I did get you and ziq confused because you're both thin-skinned petty tyrants who exemplify the trope that some anarchists are opposed to hierarchy purely on the basis of knowing what they themselves act like when they command the tiniest bit of power. You're much more talented than ziq is though; ziq is the one who spends their time using dozens of sock puppet accounts whereas you spend your time coding. My bad.

Lol, OK, confusing me with ziq is just out of this world. It's even more egregious than just accusing me of being zr0 since I write nothing like ziq and have had public spats with ziq.

PS: I'd love to see you present any evidence of petty tyranny on my end.

Anyone can read your comment and anyone can identify the ableism in it and how it violates your own code of conduct. You're not beating the allegations that you're allowed a little ableism and hypocrisy, as a treat, as long as it's justified by attacking the tankies.

Which comment of mine would that be?

Anyway, now that you've been backed into a corner yet-again it's your turn to reply with some insult or to dispute the contents of this comment before ending it with "disengage". That's the play here, isn't it?

Very cool that you're pre-emptively denigrating your own instance rules. No comment.

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Hahaha your first reply is worded terribly for implication. You basically implied that it was your account. If you had said "Are you implying that that is my account/alt?" it would have read completely differently. I get what you're saying now, my bad.

That was a peculiar way to word it though.

conflating someone with someone else, when that other character is bad, is a form of character assassination.

Ah, ableism is bad now. Got it. It's nice that you've arrived at a principled position on this matter at last.

Not to mention that it's a shitty practice to randomly accuse people of sockpuppetry just to hate on them.

You're weirdly defensive about it. If you had just said "That isn't my account, this is the moderator action that was taken in response to the ableism" it wouldn't have been a big deal.

It's not random though, we both know you have used variations on usernames with zero that use the numeral 0 in place of the o. It's been like two decades of it by this point. I'm not saying that it's definitely you but there's a pattern and that user matches it so you can see why that username would throw out a false positive.

Lol, OK, confusing me with ziq is just out of this world. It's even more egregious than just accusing me of being zr0 since I write nothing like ziq and have had public spats with ziq.

So? I'm not surprised that you have. ziq has spats with everyone, even just on their main accounts, but if it was a competition of who is more thin-skinned you'd give ziq a run for their money.

But I'm not confusing you with ziq, I'm saying that the both of you have more in common with each other than you'd like to admit. I know that you are different people, I never said you were the same. This is exactly what I'm saying about being thin-skinned though.

Very cool that you're pre-emptively denigrating your own instance rules. No comment.

No. I'm saying that you abuse that rule and you've even been in threads where you have done so multiple times and you've been called out for it by multiple users and yet, shockingly, you didn't demonstrate any accountability for it. Be serious.

What happened? You used to be cooler than this a long time ago.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Glad I see you finally admit you were wrong and spreading disinfo, but a simple "I fucked up, I apologize" would have sufficed. I honestly don't care for your excuses, especially when you couldn't even bring yourself to apologize.

Not going to engage with the rest of your bait either. Just came here to call you out and clear things up.

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Okay buddy. Are you gonna clear up the misinformation that you have spread here by grossly and wilfully misinterpreting my words at every turn? No?

I doubt it. Accountability is tricky, no?

a simple "I fucked up, my bad" would have sufficed.

Okay, the guy who never apologizes is gonna lecture me on how to do an apology. Sure.

Did I not say "I get what you're saying now, my bad" or are you demanding that I must word things specifically to meet your satisfaction?

Not going to engage with the rest of your bait either.

Okay, settle down. If everything I've said is bait then you've done a bad job of not engaging with it and if I've approached this in good faith then this is just a cheap ploy to dodge and save face after I closed off the opportunity for you to abuse the disengage rule, as you are wont to do.

Just came here to call you out and clear things up.

Have you ever read the anarchist theorist Ivan Illich on the topic of counterproductivity? 🤭

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago

🍿🍿🍿🍿>

[–] tane@lemy.lol 4 points 6 days ago

You very much seem like a huge piece of shit. Fuck off.