this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
222 points (99.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8796 readers
680 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they pull a gun off of you and you continue to be non-compliant it is not unreasonable for them to assume you could have another weapon

Why is that not unreasonable? I mean, by that logic why bother with step one? Why not just assume anyone who is resisting has a weapon and murder them?