this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
115 points (99.1% liked)

News

34394 readers
3235 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/Alo8q

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 81 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Well, I have to commend them on their compassion. I'm not sure I would have done the same; and that's being an epileptic myself...

What stayed with Amundson most, she said, was not the adrenaline of the moment but the realization that came while she was holding the agent’s head in her hands and keeping his airway open.

“I was hit so hard with the fact that this man would not do this for me,” she said.

Her mind went immediately to Renee Good.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I couldn't. Not just because it's ICE, but because if I didn't manage to save him I know I'd be charged with murder.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean even from a purely transactional perspective, they did the best thing they could have done in that moment.

If they let him die, a brownshirt might have taken out their frustration on them.

If they shot an ICE agent and ran, they wouldn't have gotten that far and would have gotten the attention of the top Trump ghouls.

Whereas, by saving his life, they got better treatment, convinced a few brownshirts of the value of humanity, and a PR win for the anti-ICE coalition.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You're not wrong. I'm only saying what my personal thought would have been.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago

Saving him direcrly harms his victims. By saving him you become culpable.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 29 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I feel the same way. I got to the part where she unholstered his gun and wondered to myself if I would have that same grace.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's been interesting to see the debate back and fourth over whether this was the right move. The moral 'you should help another human being in need' vs the logical 'don't aid the 'enemy', one less person against you+family'...

It's such a difficult decision; knowing they wouldn't help you if roles were reversed, and may even blame you if he doesn't pull through. With 12h to think sbout it; I still don't know which direction I'd go.

I do have to wonder what story the Administration is going to spin to vilify them anyway...

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

I mostly was thinking about it practically — it’s a pretty straightforward case to make that a federal agent feared for his life because someone handled their service weapon and that justified the use of lethal force, even by a more law-abiding federal agency during a more liberal administration.