this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
67 points (100.0% liked)

news

24540 readers
745 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a harbor in Tasiilak, Greenland.


NATO infighting? You love to see it, folks.

The latest incident of America's satrapies becoming increasingly unhappy about their mandated kowtowing involves, of all places, Greenland. As I'm sure most people here are aware, Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark with a degree of geopolitical and economic importance - the former due to its proximity to Russia, and the latter due to the proven and potential reserves of minerals that could be mined there. It's also been an odd fascination of Trump during his reign, now culminating in outright demands.

Trump has called for negotiations with Denmark to purchase Greenland, justifying this by stating that it would be safer from Russia and China under America's protection. Apparently, Norway's decision to not give him the Nobel Peace Prize further inflamed him (not that the Norweigan government decides who receives the prizes). He has also said that countries that do not allow him to make the decision - which not only includes Denmark, but also other European countries - will suffer increased tariffs by June, and that he has not ruled out a military solution.

This threat has led to much internal bickering inside the West, with European leaders stating they will not give in to Trump's demands, and even sending small numbers of troops to Greenland. The most bizarre part of this whole affair is that the US already basically has total military access and control over Greenland anyway, and has since the 1950s, when they signed an agreement with Denmark. There are already several US military facilities on Greenland, and B-52 bombers have famously flown in the vicinity of the island (and crashed into it with nuclear bombs in tow, in fact). Therefore, this whole event - in line with his all-performance, little-results presidency so far - seems to be largely about the theatrics of forcing the Europeans to continue to submit to his whims. I would not be surprised if they ultimately do sign a very imbalanced deal, though - the current European leadership is bound too tightly to the US to put up even half-hearted resistance.

This is all simultaneously occurring alongside the Canadian Prime Minister's visit to China in which longstanding sore spots in their bilateral relationship are being addressed, with China reducing tariffs on Canadian canola oilseeds, and Canada reducing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, as well as currency swaps between their central banks, among many other things. It seems no accident that Canada's reconsideration of their relationship with China is occurring as Trump has made remarks about turning Canada into the next US state, as well as the demand for the renegotiation of the USMCA.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 47 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

antelope-popcorn In other news there were Presidential elections in portugal last sunday, the most cursed result was avoided but they're still indicative of how the country has and is shifting right after the legislative elections last year. In the end the socialist party candidate won and is the frontrunner to win the 2nd round, which is the first time Portugal has had a second round of a presidential election in 40 years and could also leave us with a center-left president for the first time in 20 years.

I wrote a few months ago how for months the frontrunner was a former "neither left nor right" navy admiral" who was responsible for the covid vaccine rollout, well he crashed and burned, in part because once he started opening his mouth nobody knew what he actually believed, he tried to gather votes from center-left voters who were unsatisfied with the socialist party candidate by talking left and from the right by being a military guy, didn't work, he got 12% and 4th place.

The second biggest loser was a tv pundit of the governing center-right "social democratic party" (PSD), the current president is also a PSD guy and had also been a tv pundit for many years so it was thought that this man had a clear path to the presidency, and he had the backing of the ruling government which won the elections in 2025. Well some scandals around lobbying and attacks from the before mentioned military guy dimished his standing considerably, he went from leading the polls to gaining only 11%, 5th place and more than a million less votes than the party got in the 2025 legislative elections. Proving a theory that in Portugal voters usually pick a president against the rulling party, so when the PSD and the right already have a majority in parliament, the 2 autonomous regions and the most mayorships having the president also would be putting all the eggs in the same basket

(CONTENT WARNING: SA, skip this section if you want) In a despairing outcome, the right-wing liberal (think Millei-esque)** candidate got 16% and 3rd place, winning 600k more votes compared to 2025 and racking up a lot of celebrity endorsements, he ran a social media savvy campaign that relied on being a "relatable cool uncle with good vibes", masking politics that are primarily bout austerity and privatization, he messed up by in one interview saying that if the far-right candidate made it to the second round he wouldn't exclude voting for him, which he later walked back, and also by (CONTENT WARNING: SA) probably sexually harassing a former assistant of the liberal party's parliamentary group (currently assistant in the ruling government minister). She accused him of asking her stuff like "Excelent work the only thing left is opening your legs for me" and "do you like them thicker or longer". A not surprising reappearance of the MeToo movement which never made much headway in Portugal, I say unsurprising because this is a very right-wing liberal party and although culturaly liberal on paper everyone knows a ton of its members are conservative (despite garnering much of the youth vote). It's since been revealed that more women inside the party have complained about sexual harassement. To which the candidate responded by denying, victimizing himself and attacking the media, all this didn't seem to affect his standing with liberal voters, unsurprisingly, for a while people even thought he would make it to the 2nd round.

The far-right hyperleader got 2nd place with 23% and only 100k less votes compared to 2025, revealing now how loyal his voters are. Not much to say, he bangs on about migration, immigrants living only on subsidies (incredibly false) and roma people. Really there weren't any major scandals for him this time around, he just loomed over the election as the one everyone knew would make it to the second round. His party hasn't lost any standing since despite the governing center-right depending on the far-right party for plenty of things they aren't oficially in a coalition (and the government relies on the socialist party sometimes too) so they're permanently in the opposition for people who don't like the government and in support for people who do like the government.

The surprise comeback was the socialist party backed candidate Antonio José Seguro getting first place with 31% and 300k more votes than the center-left socialist party got in the 2025 election, where they got the worst ever result. He is a man of the right of the socialist party who is emblematic of the party's colaboration with the right wing government in 2011-2015 during the Troika period by, according to him, "violently abstaining" from the governments many damaging policies. His campaign started poorly with him refusing to call himself of the left, stating "why do you want to label me?", realizing this meant there was no mainstream left candidate and that the navy admiral was attempting to court socialist party voters who felt orphaned he started talking more left. Started low in the polls but made it up and started campaigning on the "useful vote" against the far-right, "Vota Seguro" (Seguro means "safe", and also "insurance"), which seems to have worked as the left candidates had very poor results in yet another demonstration that the presence of the far-right, fear of it and unwillingness to ever let it formally govern (even when it already informally does) only strengthens the center and empties the left. He is the frontrunner to win in the second round agaisnt the far-right, although all the right-wing candidates (and the admiral) and the center-left PM have refused to endorse him against the far-right (but people from their parties have), the left wing candidates already have. If he wins he'll be the first socialist party candidate to win the presidency in 20 years.

possum-party The communist party candidate, whom I voted for, and objectively speaking the most adequate candidate to defend the constitution (which is what the non-executive portuguese president is supposed to do) got only 1.6% and less 90k votes compared to 2025, the worst of any communist party candidate ever got in a presidential election. Not surprising with everything I just said, and on the campaign trail the "useful vote" for Seguro was the biggest challenge, y'know after the whole COMMUNIST thing and also having a taken a much denounced anti-NATO position on the ukraine war and more recently a pro-Maduro position on Venezuela, there's already a ton of factors that discard the communist party in people's eyes for now (anti-EU might be the most significant one), so fear of a second round with 2 right-wing candidates instead of the socialist party candidate didn't do us any favors.

The post-trotskyist demsoc party candidate got 2%, which is around what they got in the 2025 elections where they got reduced to 1 MP, still the worst result for a presidential candidate backed by the party (which got 3rd place in 2016) but it shows that maybe (I have my doubts because their candidate is decently popular on the center-left) they're holding on.

The best result of the night was tha the eurocuck pro-war green party's candidate got LESS THAN 1% and 220k less votes compared to 2025, showing that this party which has made a goal of emptying the portuguese left of anti-imperialism, eu-skepticism and anti-capitalism (politics that voters to the left of the socialist party had to stomach when they voted for the communist party or the demsocs) and promissing to be a loyal junior party to the socialist party, seems like their candidate, who on the final days said he accepted if people voted for Seguro (why even run then bro?), was the biggest victim of the useful vote.

In conclusion nobody, especially on the left, was very excited for these elections, we all knew the right was going to win, even with Seguro being the fronrunner he is emblematic of the socialist party right. Unlike in the last elections it seems like right-wing and centrist voters dispersed their votes and the left aggregated on Seguro "to play it safe". I'm going to be hugging all my comrades, though no one in the party ever gets depressed for too long

But the silver lining in Seguro becoming president is that, besides having a president on the nominal left to push back a bit on this government (he has called on the government to remove the planned labour law "reform" which is encouraging, hope he sticks to it), is that the current center-right president Marcelo, perverted the position by taking a much more active stake in national politics than traditionally presidents ever did, one thing was being on constant travel hugging and kissing people, that's fine. But constantly commentanting on matters, pressuring governments, DISSOLVING 3 GOVERNMENTS (2 of them socialist party governments) and constantly calling "council of state meetings" for stuff that he has no power over like the ukraine war and venezuela became majorly annoying by his 2nd term. And all candidates on the right, though not Seguro, constantly talked about "leadership" and all the powers they would take advantage of, when really the president's job is to for the most part veto shit that goes against the constitution, which they already have mangled from its original content after the revolution, but hopefuly he can stick to doing that and shutting up about it.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

the worst of any communist party candidate ever got in a presidential election

FUCK

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

European society is not ready for the correct position on Ukraine, the material conditions haven't crashed down hard enough on them yet and the war has not been compelled to end yet, but as long as the communists hold the line on that it will be to their benefit once they face the reactionary fascists who "discovered" the anti EU, anti NATO position when the neoliberal incumbents have no use.

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 5 points 10 hours ago

European society is not ready for the correct position on Ukraine

Unfortunately I think so too, and Portuguese people are INSANELY pro-EU too, including the far right. The only pocket of EU-skepticism is on the far-left.

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 22 points 21 hours ago

"neither left nor right" navy admiral" who was responsible for the covid vaccine rollout, well he crashed and burned, in part because once he started opening his mouth nobody knew what he actually believed

thats the funniest shit i've read all day. also very predictable né