this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
99 points (99.0% liked)

News

35036 readers
3262 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67860-3

Large earthquakes occurring worldwide have long been recognized to be non Poisson distributed, so involving some large scale correlation mechanism, which could be internal or external to the Earth. Till now, no statistically significant correlation of the global seismicity with one of the possible mechanisms has been demonstrated yet. In this paper, we analyze 20 years of proton density and velocity data, as recorded by the SOHO satellite, and the worldwide seismicity in the corresponding period, as reported by the ISC-GEM catalogue. We found clear correlation between proton density and the occurrence of large earthquakes (M > 5.6), with a time shift of one day. The significance of such correlation is very high, with probability to be wrong lower than 10 –5. the correlation increases with the magnitude threshold of the seismic catalogue. A tentative model explaining such a correlation is also proposed, in terms of the reverse piezoelectric effect induced by the applied electric field related to the proton density. This result opens new perspectives in seismological interpretations, as well as in earthquake forecast.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It kind of makes sense, there's a large mass of charged particles being deflected by the Earth's magnetic field, so there must be some kind of corresponding force applied back to the field/the dynamo generating it. Interesting that the leading hypothesis is that it manifests piezoelectrically in rock.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I found the fact that its basically the piezoelectric effect (in reverse of how I'm used to thinking about it) at a massive scale, to be fascinating. I've always been interested in those fans you put on wood burning stoves, which take some heat energy to spin a fan.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What are the quantitative forces of a CME versus the Earth's fields? I feel like any regular charged particle emissions from the sun would be far weaker than a planetary electromagnetic field, especially in terms of induction.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I suspect that the electrical-force would be .. insane, given that Quebec Hydro kept having their grid getting millions of volts, from aurora ( popping their systems )..

& if you've got wet, fractured tectonic-plates, with some fault-zones near-release,

& then you put a gentle, but IMMENSE geographically, force on them .. then the statistical likelihood of stress-release would go up..

I'm not presuming piezo, but I'm not saying that's wrong, either..

I'm just saying that electric-fields have proven, in space, to reach WAAAY farther than we assumed..

& if we were getting that wrong, then we may be getting it wrong in the Earth, too..

The primary force would be electric, since it's from positive & negative plasma being pulled to different locations on Earth..

& then it should all come down to how-sensitive-the-balance-is, among the tectonic faults, & how that electric current affects those zones, including how it flows through mineralized-water..

( that 24h-delay means something: there's some process which takes that long, for it to tip the balance.. )

_ /\ _

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

There's an app for that, and it's called Carrington.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yup there it is