this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
219 points (98.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7835 readers
465 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://news.abolish.capital/post/20413

1%

The global richest 1% have already emitted their share of carbon for the entire 2026 year and it’s only the beginning of January, according to a report from Oxfam. Meanwhile, the richest 0.1% used all their yearly carbon budget on the 3rd of January.

‘Pollutocrat day’

The consumption and investment of the super rich has devastating consequences. While the 1% disproportionately cause the crisis, it’s the global south that will face the most climate repercussions. The climate emissions of the richest 1% in a single year will cause 1.3m heat related deaths by the end of the century. And when it comes to economic damage, the impact by 2050 could be £32.7bn for lower and middle income countries.

Huge change is necessary from the capitalist class, who are embedded with politicians through donations and lobbying. To stay within the critical 1.5 degrees of warming limit, the 1% would have to reduce their emissions by 97% by 2030.

“Simple route”

Oxfam’s Climate Policy Lead Nafkote Dabi said:

Time and time again, the research shows that governments have a very clear and simple route to drastically slash carbon emissions and tackle inequality: by targeting the richest polluters. By cracking down on the gross carbon recklessness of the super-rich, global leaders have an opportunity to put the world back on track for climate targets and unlock net benefits for people and the planet

The immense power and wealth of super-rich individuals and corporations have also allowed them to wield unjust influence over policymaking and water down climate negotiations.

It’s not just the super rich’s consumption through yachts and private jets, but their investments in fossil fuels. Oxfam’s research found that each billionaire, on average, has investments that will produce 1.9 million tonnes of carbon every year.

The influence of fossil fuel giants also goes beyond politicians. The sheer volume of lobbyists from fossil fuel companies at the leading climate summit in Brazil in November 2025 was 1,600 attendees.

Solutions

Oxfam presented ways to solve the super rich-caused climate crisis. These include increased taxes on wealth to rebalance societies away from excessive carbon use and a profit tax on fossil fuel companies.

But a publicly owned Green New Deal would bring the essential of energy into public ownership while also addressing the climate crisis in one fell swoop. Politicians need to think boldly if we are to stop global catastrophe.

Featured image via the Canary

By James Wright


From Canary via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

a lot of it is done through private jets; the upper half isn't rich enough to own those.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

The actual problem is overshoot. Here's an overview for the average USian https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/sustainability-indicators/us-environmental-footprint-factsheet

Energetically, it's a resting metabolic rate of a blue whale.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

Ban private jets.