this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
423 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27156 readers
3094 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/2OdeD

Attorney General Pam Bondi was so furious with six federal prosecutors who announced they would resign rather than prosecute the widow of a Minnesota woman killed by an ICE agent that she fired them before they had a chance to give their notice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 143 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

They should have just not said anything dragged their feet while at work while slowly eating up annual/sick leave to really slow everything down. Now there are 4 vacancies that could have been tied up for the better part of a year.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 85 points 20 hours ago

Bingo. Drag your feet, use up time. File shitty motions you know won't work to tie up the courts. Sabotage is hard work, but slowing the gears of the Orphan Crushing Machine is important and actually pretty easy to do when it's the federal government.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 12 hours ago

I agree with "don't quit, impede" philosophy, but a very public show of support against these fascist actions is not something to dismiss.

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 68 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's better strategically but you need to have the strength to do so. Sometimes people are overwhelmed by something and just need to get out of the situation and I think that is OK too. Everyone should do what they are capable off, but it should be fine to just stop doing wrong stuff.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's easy to tell people what they should be doing, from the outside.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

A government derives its authority from the consent of the governed. The governed offer their consent as part of a social contract. The government's role in that contract is to represent the will of the governed by enforcing the laws passed by our representatives.

The reason it's easy for us to expect them to remain and enforce the law, is because that's what they promised us in exchange for following their laws and paying their taxes.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

A government derives its authority from the consent of the governed.

And the DoJ no longer had the consent of their prosecutors in Minnesota, so they walked, as was their right.

Walking out en masse and taking their combined years of experience with them was the right thing to do. Now the regime that already has a serious problem retaining legal talent has to go find some more talentless hacks to fill these empty positions, lol.

There's a reason Pam Bondi's truly pissed by this, and it's not all superficial.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Public servants have an obligation to the general public that overrides all other priorities. If you're not prepared to use your powers to resist fascism, or even corruption, on behalf of the public you serve, you shouldn't pursue a career in public service.

We consent to following their rules in exchange for them representing our will; that is the social contract between a government and her governed people.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 4 points 14 hours ago

Public servants are not the government. They have an obligation to do what the government tells them to do.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

You write as though you have no idea whatsoever how this works in reality.

Go read up on Alina Habba and Lindsey Halligan. Great legs, mediocre attorneys, illegal appointments, and they've lost more for the regime than they ever even began to win.

Hell, I'll make it easy for you and give you a TL;DR: because the previous Virginia AG refused to prosecute revenge charges for Trump against his political enemies and walked out, and was replaced by Lindsey Halligan, the resulting questionable legal moves and political drama meant that in the end charges against James Comey and Letitia James have been dropped altogether. Similar situation with Alina Habba, who is now no longer New Jersey AG.

[–] nocteb@feddit.org 5 points 15 hours ago

Or you find that you can't and quit.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

ice is technically a public servant.... stupid treasonous mother fuckers

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Weren't these the people earlier this week who supposedly resigned, of which people were complaining about. Now it comes out they were actually fired before they even could...

Maybe people should realize there might have been more going on that we aren't privy to.

All this 'not good enough' thinking does is breed toxicity and in-fighting. Both of which are not good when trying to form a solidarity.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Weren’t these the people earlier this week who supposedly resigned, of which people were complaining about. Now it comes out they were actually fired before they even could…

The prosecutors announced their intent to resign, and would have done so after using up their allocated PTO. A fairly standard practice in professional environments. Pam Bondi fired them in retaliation for announcing their intent to resign

She claimed it was because they wanted a tax payer funded vacation, but anyone who understands the basics of unemployment, especially in Minnesota, can tell you she just gave them even more tax payer money (if they want it). Not only will they be entitled to their PTO, but they are not also entitled to unemployment

[–] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We also dont know the situation that led up to them resigning and getting fired. They very well could have been trying to drag their feet but were already under immense pressure to file charges immediately. No amount of feet dragging can help if the Nazis are literally hovering over you as you fill out the paperwork.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Oh, yeah, you see how they checked this box here? That means we also need a DD-2319 form signed in triplicate here. That'll need to be approved by two levels of management, so we'll need to form a committee to assess its suitability before raising it for a vote during our Change Control Board meeting, which only occurs monthly. Sorry about that. Don't worry, I'll get it fast-tracked for you."

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

You do realize they likely don't care about doing things the right way, as they'll just have Trump approve any bypass, whether legal or not.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 22 points 20 hours ago

even moronic lawyers betting on trump over the constitution have to know there's no way that bloated sack of animated cholesterol is going to make it to 2028, and then where are they? working for couchfucker?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't going to be able to fill these because fed attorney jobs pay dick and there is zero prestige to these postings now.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well, maybe true for qualified people, the job title is no longer prestigious.

But for the scum of the earth? That job title legitimizes them, by comparison.

I think I know which type will be the ones applying...

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but the defining characteristic of those people is that they are also bad at their jobs. Look at what happened to their prosecutions of former prosecutors that charged Trump. The guys that left were undoubtedly CONSIDERABLY better at their jobs than whoever will replace them.

That's fair, and I'll take any silver lining at this point.

Some people just don't want to eat shit for a living.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

not everyone seeks "lowering the bar" transgressions for feels

these people want to change the world not troll their boss