this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
706 points (98.9% liked)

World News

51966 readers
2276 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What's stopping the US from nuking the shit out of Greenwich

[–] SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fuck did Greenwich ever do?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Got mean about time.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First off it's not that far from the US so they might get some fallout from that. Second, they are doing this for access to rare earth minerals which will be considerably harder to get under conditions of nuclear radiation. It may make the whole project untenable for a long time. Which is the opposite of what they want.

So generally, even removing all the humanitarian and geopolitical ramifications, which would be enormous, I don't think it would serve their interests

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Newest generation of nukes has significantly reduced fallout and can be re-occupied by troops in days. Scary stuff

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The logical counter response I guess would be for Denmark to get their own nukes and nuke the Americans on Greenland then. Then everyone can just keep nuking Greenland every few years.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seems like a waste when we could just nuke everything and give up on the whole society thing

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago

We'd probably get there eventually.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The immediatelly obvious reason is that you can't really have resource extraction operations in a nuclear wasteland, so Greenland (which is what I assume you were trying to spell) would become useless for them.

The next big reason is the same as why Russia isn't doing it in Ukraine - any nation that agressivelly uses nukes will be turned on by everybody else and end up nuked themselves, because if nuclear aggression is not severely punished, other countries will go nuclear ASAP with more and more countries actually using nukes in war, incentivising even more countries to go nuclear and use nukes, a vicious cycle which is guaranteed to end with all life on planet Earth dead. Specifically in the case of Greenland, it would be an attack on Europe which not only already has 2 nuclear armed nations but also is the region in the World with the most non-nuclear countries with the knowhow and technology to go nuclear very fast if they feel threathened, so the delay between America attacking European territory with nukes and ending up a nuclear wasteland itself would be a lot smaller than if America had attacked with nukes, say, countries in Latin America (and even that would end up with America turned into glass, it would just take longer).

Obviously the highest levels of the American Military know this (its not as if they haven't run countless scenarios on it) and would be far more likely to choose to assassinate Trump if he ever gave such an order (which would be even easier to do than the whole "Kidnap Maduro" thing) than to nuke an European nation and start a cycle that would end up with cockroaches being the dominant species of this planet.