this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

5095 readers
329 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AT&T and Verizon claim right to a jury trial was violated by FCC fines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This seems shortsighted by these companies. A jury trial is way more expensive and public with a chance of paying as much or more fines anyway. Sure it takes longer to get a ruling, but that seems like a small win.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is purely about stripping power from federal agencies.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't strip power though, it just moves it to something that hits the news cycle multiple times.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The News cycle is washed away every 12 hours. With forced arbitration and our courts corrupt and back logged to hell. Corporations just need to stall until the next republican government throws out the past cases. They don't care about spending more money if it means more power over workers and consumers.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they're betting that the telcos have more money for their legal departments than the FCC does. I wonder though if it's true that a jury can award damages in excess of the requested amount in the case of regulatory fines the same way juries can when deciding civil suits for damages. Maybe.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

They might have better lawyers, but generally the big club of the government is the inevitability factor. Federal departments are basically immortal and have no profit motive to justify the continued budget.