this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
84 points (98.8% liked)

Slop.

762 readers
491 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
84
"Tankie Bingo" (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by LemmySlopSkimmer@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
 

Had some fun with this. Rules:

  1. When a tankie post comes up, post a legitimate, fair argument. Do not argue in bad faith. No matter how nasty the post may be. Legitimately combat the disinformation there by going into their bubble and posting a sane response.
  2. Watch the responses come in. Especially if the post is on the tankie triad.
  3. Don't feed the trolls. Don't respond to anything, unless there is actually a legitimate attempt to have a legitimate discussion. Otherwise, start a game of tankie bingo to help prevent yourself from responding to the madness.

Suggestions for expansion welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 54 points 3 days ago (3 children)

EDIT: well, to the surprise of no one, it’s made its way to the slop community at Hexbear. Aaaand again, they totally miss the glaringly obvious point.

@unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth what's the point if it's so obvious? There's various comments here that went through the arduous task of breaking down the things you wrote in your meme and responding to them. I take it that us "tankies" are simply too unskilled at the English language and rhetoric for it to even be necessary to address these before you claim victory?

Go ahead, you're federated with us!

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 49 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Also, @unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth, it's not nice to put that little rules section in your post where the first one is to always engage in good faith with tankies when yesterday you were in the thread comparing the Tank Man in China to Renee Nicole Good's murder and claimed they were both executed, then proceeded to blatantly ignore all requests for evidence for that claim and dismissed them all. That's good faith? You even admitted that the one article you did click on you only read for a little bit.

Really cheeky to put Tiananmen Square Massacre denial in a square too, for someone who claims it happened yet has no sources.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're both not banned from here and they've made comments here in the past 24 hours. Plainly speaking they're a coward and a fascist if they don't show up to defend their lies

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that the one that's obsessed about communist control of lemmy?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes but they're too late to stop us now.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't get why these people can't change their views once presented with evidence that contradicts their worldview. I used to think Tank Man turned into a pancake, then I saw the full video and read lots of articles from several perspectives, read on-the-ground reports, etc. I'm not denying it was a tragic event but I'm also not going to sit here and say "CCP bad!" for a few reasons:

  • People are rarely purely "good" or "bad"
  • Sames goes for nations
  • The situation was more complicated than American History lessons would lead you to believe
  • Governments can make mistakes and still be worthy of support

I know, insert False Witnesses here. I just wish people would learn that we're not gung-ho about this stuff. The big difference between me and you Mr. Lib is I apply more critical thinking and am willing to conclude "it's not that simple".

Is this an autism thing to dig deeper into history? Are most people happy living with surface-level knowledge of countries they don't live in? Which OK fine... I don't know much about the NFL but you don't see me vehemently defending the Eagles' conversion rate because I wouldn't know what I'm talking about!

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago

You'd think they would recognise that this counts as "nuance" but "nuance" is when you say "Enemies of the US bad and irredeemable cartoon villains, but US isn't perfect either, so I'm not biased."

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

I don't think it's an autism thing but I'm a fellow autist that finds this pattern of behavior extremely frustrating.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

Really cheeky to put Tiananmen Square Massacre denial in a square too, for someone who claims it happened yet has no sources.

South African white genocide denial

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

I'd love for them to explain how Taiwan is a country and how Taiwan understands the situation.

This is a matter of hard facts. It should be a cinch to prove that it's a country, right?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't their entire point of the bingo bad faith?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

I don't know, they said the point of their post couldn't be more obvious and I'm having a bit of trouble understanding it myself (after all, I suffer from the tankie physiognomy) so I'm waiting for clarification.

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

@unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth You are welcome to come here with actual arguments instead of hiding away in the liberal Vatican.

For someone who won’t stop waxing poetic about the philosophy of truth you seem to have a hard time understanding how burden of proof works, so I’ll just make things simple: why don’t you provide evidence for your claims instead of seeking validation from politically illiterate babies who worship at the altar of liberal orthodoxy? Why don’t you respond to the criticisms of your infantile points instead of editing your post to whine about them?

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago

@unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth How are you not in an echo chamber? You flee whenever you encounter valid arguments conflicting with your worldview and you do this kind of stuff. Also your breath stinks.