this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
351 points (99.7% liked)

PC Gaming

13176 readers
411 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What I heard on the ground floor from various system integrators, components manufacturers, and other companies, is memory supply has been tied up for all of 2026, and that shortages could last as long as until 2031.

Sure it's scuttlebutt but wouldn't surprise me as being true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Part of it is not finished DRAM that was sold yet, it's wafer capacity at the factory.

Sam Altman has promised orders for a kazillion wafers that don't exist yet. It's been argued this is less legitimate demand and more an effort to crimp the scaling ambitions of other competitors.

If his cheque bounces early on, the manufacturers are likely to reassign his slots to other buyers.

The manufacturers are taking a fair bit of risk though. If they aren't getting paid before work starts, and the bubble pops in the middle, thry could end up with a lot of (partially or fully) finished wafers that they can't just slice up and sell to Corsair and G.Skill.

[–] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You are not wrong about the reallocation part. However, if you see the actions from micron (fuck you micron BTW), they are going all in and having a shit storm in PR on the consumer side. If they are taking these risks without proper assurances, then they are utterly deranged

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Promises of buying only work if the buyer still exists at the time you produce the goods.
Besides, I'm pretty sure that the main buyers type on the consumer side are PC and phone makers. So they could go back there almost unharmed.

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure there's a way to have proper assurances for such vast sums of silicon and money. You're going with the flow of the speculation at that point. If it pops, their best hope is for bailouts to save them (not unrealistic, but their interlocutors will then be governments, not corporations).