this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
239 points (99.2% liked)

politics

27088 readers
1625 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On topic after topic, President Trump made clear that he would be the arbiter of any limits to his authorities, not international law or treaties.

Its not like the American Revolution and Constitution are total rejections of this view or anything.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 65 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Its past time to become ungovernable. The democrats are fucking spineless but they should already be paying for bus loads of angry people to head to washington. Every lib is shitting their pants instead of organizing.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its past time to become ungovernable.

It's in the works and even MAGAs are clamoring for a tax strike . Then there is the general strike movement . There is also the Women's March .

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We had a sort of General Strike going when we shut the government down. We didn't shut down our own jobs, but we shut down the government, which was the most pressing problem. We were willing to wait out the hunger and lack of government assistance for as long as it took, all the way to the Midterm elections if necessary. The entire Midterm campaign could have been a massive nationwide food and medical drive to help the people that MAGA abandoned.

But as soon as it started to affect the airports, and corporations couldn't move their operatives around, the cowardly DINO leadership voluntarily surrendered within 48 hours, and got less than nothing in return, just deserved humiliation and the righteous indignation of their base.

We could be a lot more effective if the people we hired had our backs. We have theirs, but they don't seem to care, they've got Insider Trading on their minds.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean "we"?? The government shut down the government. The American people had no part in that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure... but supporting something and actually doing something are two different things. What if we still wanted the government shutdown but democrats didn't? Who do you think would get their way? Us or the politicians? You make it seem like we the people went to D.C. and shut it down ourselves.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

I will agree that overall, they don't care about us much, but if they didn't care about us at all, as you assert, the government would never have shut down in the first place. It's not so much that they care about us personally, but they care very much about our votes, so they have to pretend. They were trying to preserve Obamacare for the PEOPLE, not because they care, but because they knew that just letting it go without a fight would hurt them later at the polls.

The potential outrage from voters influenced them to pursue the shutdown in the first place. Unfortunately, they eventually folded, because ultimately, the DINO Bosses are weak, cowardly, insipid, wormy little bitches.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I would be expecting Jill Stein and Anonymous Anarchist Guy to be doing this - but, nothing.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's almost like Stein is a Russian tool or something

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Lot.of that going around.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Stein the Shill is back in cold storage until 2028.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

They just need her to shave a couple of points from the Dem vote.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

You might want to check out Anonymous News . They have hard hitting videos.

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Democratic lawmakers aren't going to save us. That party has also been taken over by corpo fascist billionaires.

No I'm not saying both sides are the same. Just that what's happening right now is class warfare, the elite control the democratic party too. They aren't going to save us from themselves.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like to compare it to a workplace. Some managers are cool to work for, and some are total assholes who terrorize every moment at work.

We all want to work for the cool boss, but make no mistake, BOTH bosses have the same ultimate agenda, which is to force us to toe the company line. One manipulates us, and one forces us, but the result is the same.

We can try to get our managers to represent us to the top, but they are always going to be more interested in protecting their own interests than ours. Eventually, we'll have to just go around them, and "appeal" to the top ourselves.

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep. As long as all the money is flowing up the system will be corrupt, and the managers aren't willingly going to interrupt that flow. So we will have to have a "meeting" with them and "parley".

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm just saying, thats why J6 was possible. Unfortunately, revolutions cost money along with the organizing.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If they'd sprung for catering on Jan6, they would have won the day, but all those Dumb Apes got hungry for dinner and headed back to the Motel 6 to celebrate and drink to their "Victory."

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 days ago

Imagine going home when all that sweet politician meat is a couple feet away.